Skip to main content

Security report for koll-steine.de

KOLL Steine · Other · Germany

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KOLL Steine operates as a specialized supplier of stone products, catering to customers interested in natural stones for construction and landscaping. The website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and integrates common SEO and analytics tools such as Yoast SEO and Google Analytics. The technical infrastructure is standard for small to medium-sized businesses, hosted on rzone.de servers. Security posture is moderate but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating room for improvement in security transparency. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
55/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching koll-steine.de

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
55
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets the stone product market in Germany, likely serving both retail and wholesale customers. The business model revolves around product sales with a focus on quality and variety of stone materials. The website's use of established CMS and SEO tools suggests an intent to maintain a visible online presence. However, the absence of detailed contact information and compliance policies may limit trust and customer engagement. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the data provided. Growth potential exists with improvements in digital trust and security.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic with HTTPS assumed but no explicit security headers detected. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements, posing legal risks. No incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosures are present, which reduces readiness for security incidents. The use of standard WordPress plugins necessitates regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility to improve business credibility and customer trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KOLL Steine
Description
KOLL Steine is a business specializing in stones and related products, likely serving customers interested in natural stone products for construction, landscaping, or decoration.
Key services
Stone products sales, Landscaping materials, Construction materials
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Avada Theme, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Font Awesome, WP Rocket
Frameworks
Avada Framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  3. Contact information such as emails or phone numbers not explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. Uses common WordPress plugins and themes indicating a standard CMS setup.
  5. Includes Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts for tracking.
  6. No security headers or advanced security policies detected in the provided data.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
  8. Content is business-focused on stone products with no adult or questionable content.
  9. WHOIS data is minimal but consistent with hosting provider nameservers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with the Avada theme, supported by Yoast SEO for search optimization and Google Analytics for traffic analysis. Hosting is provided by rzone.de, as indicated by the nameservers. Performance is moderate with some optimization via WP Rocket. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring accessibility across devices. However, the absence of security headers and privacy compliance features indicates technical debt in security and legal compliance areas. Opportunities exist to modernize security configurations and enhance privacy features to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with koll-steine.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review koll-steine.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.