Skip to main content

Security report for kneesox.moe

N/A · Technology · Iceland

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kneesox.moe is a personal website operated by an individual known as Kneesox, primarily serving as a platform to share programming projects, image hosting, and personal interests. The site draws design inspiration from the videogame VA-11 HALL-A and offers tools such as a junkcode generator and a ShareX login portal. The target audience is general internet users interested in programming and niche personal content. The business model is that of a hobbyist or personal project without commercial intent or extensive market positioning. Technically, the website employs standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with the use of Howler.js for audio playback. Hosting and DNS services are provided via Cloudflare and NameCheap respectively. The site demonstrates moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No CMS or major frameworks are detected, indicating a custom-built site. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS. There are no privacy or cookie policies, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The domain is privacy protected, which is appropriate for a personal site, and no suspicious WHOIS patterns are found. Overall security posture is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices. The overall risk is low given the non-commercial and personal nature of the site, but improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and transparency would enhance trustworthiness and user confidence. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, enabling DNSSEC, and adding vulnerability disclosure information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kneesox.moe

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kneesox.moe operates as a small personal website focused on programming and image hosting, targeting a niche community of hobbyists and fans of the VA-11 HALL-A aesthetic. The site leverages social media and code repository platforms such as GitHub and Forgejo to extend its reach. The business model is non-commercial, relying on personal interest and community engagement rather than revenue generation. The lack of formal business information and contact details limits its commercial credibility but aligns with its hobbyist nature. The partnership ecosystem includes links to other personal or small community sites, indicating a collaborative but informal network. Growth indicators are minimal, consistent with a personal project rather than a commercial enterprise.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection in place. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which are important to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating a gap in compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file reduces transparency and incident response readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a personal site but not for commercial or sensitive data handling.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common attacks.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Consider adding contact information or a dedicated security contact channel to improve incident response capabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
N/A
Description
Personal website of Kneesox to share programming projects, interests, and image hosting. Inspired by the videogame VA-11 HALL-A.
Key services
Image hosting, Junkcode generator tool, ShareX login portal, Links to social and code repositories
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Howler.js (audio library), Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers provided
  3. Website is a personal hobbyist site with programming and image hosting focus
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  5. No security headers detected, SSL is enabled but basic
  6. External links mostly to social media and personal code repositories
  7. No advertising or tracking detected
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies without reliance on major CMS or frameworks, indicating a custom and lightweight implementation. The use of Howler.js suggests multimedia capabilities, specifically audio playback. Hosting is managed via Cloudflare DNS and NameCheap registrar, providing reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic with standard meta tags and Open Graph data but lacks advanced optimization. The site does not employ analytics or tracking services, reducing privacy concerns but also limiting user behavior insights. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of DNSSEC, which could be addressed to improve overall robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kneesox.moe. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kneesox.moe.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.