Skip to main content

Security report for kiprotect.com

KIProtect GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KIProtect GmbH is a small technology company founded in 2018 specializing in software solutions for data protection and privacy engineering. Their offerings include open source products such as Klaro! and Kodex, as well as consulting services like data protection evaluations and privacy engineering. The company targets organizations seeking to process sensitive data securely and in compliance with privacy regulations. Technically, the website is built with modern frontend technologies including React and Bootstrap, hosted with reputable providers and using Cloudflare DNS. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism via Klaro!, but lacks explicit security headers and published privacy or security policies. The domain registration is consistent with the company's founding date and shows no suspicious patterns, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve transparency by publishing privacy policies and security documentation.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of kiprotect.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kiprotect.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kiprotect.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4
Employees
0
Customers
4
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for kiprotect.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

KIProtect operates in the niche market of privacy-focused software and consulting, leveraging open source projects to build trust and community engagement. Their competitive advantage lies in combining software tools with expert privacy engineering services. The business model is service and software sales targeting enterprises and organizations with compliance needs. Partnerships with Klaro! and Kodex projects enhance their ecosystem. The company shows growth potential given the increasing importance of data protection. The website reflects a consistent brand and professional presence, supporting credibility and customer confidence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place. However, it lacks published privacy policies, terms of service, incident response contacts, and security certifications. No security headers were detected in the provided data, and DNSSEC is not enabled, which could be improved. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files. The absence of phone contact and physical address reduces transparency slightly. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small technology company but should be enhanced to meet higher compliance standards and customer expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage and footer.
  2. Implement and publish security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and trustworthiness.
  4. Provide clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts or policies.
  5. Add physical contact information and phone numbers to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KIProtect GmbH
Description
KIProtect develops software solutions that help process sensitive and personal data securely, legally compliant, and privacy-friendly. They offer open source solutions for anonymization and pseudonymization to protect data during processing.
Key services
Data protection evaluations, Privacy Engineering, Open source software products (Klaro!, Kodex)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, React, Bootstrap, jQuery
Frameworks
React, Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented (Klaro!)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Klaro! privacy manager, Konsens anonymizer script
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage or footer.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via Klaro! with clear consent mechanism.
  4. Contact information includes a contact form and a company email address.
  5. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed on the homepage.
  6. Website uses modern frontend technologies including React and Bootstrap.
  7. No social media links detected in the provided HTML content.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  9. No explicit security certifications or compliance frameworks mentioned.
  10. Website content is professional and focused on data protection software and services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack with React, Bootstrap, and jQuery, ensuring responsive design and good user experience. Hosting and DNS are managed by reputable providers (Hetzner and Cloudflare). Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and preloading CSS. No CMS detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. SEO is basic with meta viewport and charset tags but lacks Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. The site uses Klaro! for cookie consent and includes anonymizer scripts, reflecting privacy-conscious design. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100 +3Medium28 findingsView report
  2. 68/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kiprotect.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kiprotect.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.