Kingdom Gardens is a UK-based small business specializing in garden design, construction, and maintenance services. The website presents a professional appearance using WordPress with the Divi theme and is optimized for SEO with Yoast. The technical infrastructure is modern and includes HTTPS security, but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. No explicit privacy or cookie policies are found, and contact information is not clearly provided in the analyzed content. The website is accessible without WAF or security challenges, indicating no blocking or filtering mechanisms in place. Overall, the business appears legitimate with a domain age consistent with an established presence since 2004.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
High
Weak Protocols Supported
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.
High
Domain Expires Soon
Domain expires in 26 days
What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
45
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
43
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention kingdomgardens.co.uk, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for kingdomgardens.co.uk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Kingdom Gardens targets residential or commercial clients seeking garden-related services in the UK. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on garden creation and maintenance. The website content is basic but consistent with the brand, lacking detailed business or legal information. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The company leverages WordPress and Divi for content management and presentation, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The absence of privacy and security policies suggests room for improvement in compliance and trust-building.
Security posture
The website uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms may expose the business to GDPR compliance risks. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with standard best practices and compliance measures.
Recommendations
Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and incident response.
Consider publishing a security policy or incident response contact to enhance trust and preparedness.
Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Website uses WordPress with Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin.
No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or linked pages in provided data.
No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
No security or incident response policies or contacts found.
Website is HTTPS secured with valid SSL.
No advertising or analytics scripts detected beyond jQuery and Google Fonts.
Content is focused on garden services with a professional design but limited textual content.
No signs of WAF or content blocking.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on WordPress 7.0 using the Divi theme version 4.27.7, with jQuery 3.7.1 and Google Fonts integration. The site uses Yoast SEO plugin for search engine optimization and includes structured data in JSON-LD format for enhanced search visibility. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses modern CSS and JavaScript techniques. Hosting details are not explicit but the domain registrar is Netim SAS. Performance is moderate with no evident heavy scripts or trackers. Accessibility is basic with some semantic HTML but no advanced ARIA roles or accessibility features detected.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with kingdomgardens.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kingdomgardens.co.uk.