Skip to main content

Security report for keniabeauty.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.keniabeauty.com is currently inaccessible beyond a Cloudflare security challenge page that uses Turnstile captcha to verify visitors. This prevents access to any substantive content, business information, or contact details. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating the domain may be unregistered or privacy-protected, which raises concerns about legitimacy and transparency. The site relies on Cloudflare's security infrastructure for bot mitigation and protection, but no further technical or business details can be ascertained due to the blocking. Overall, the digital maturity and security posture cannot be fully evaluated, but the lack of accessible information and WHOIS data suggests a low trust level and potential risk for users.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching keniabeauty.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
65
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of accessible content and business information, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. There are no indications of market positioning, business model, or target audience. The domain's lack of WHOIS registration data and the presence of a WAF challenge page suggest the site may be new, inactive, or intentionally obscured. No partnerships, certifications, or trust signals are visible.

Security posture

The website employs Cloudflare's security challenge platform, including Turnstile captcha and a strict Content-Security-Policy header, indicating a baseline security posture focused on bot mitigation. However, the inability to access the site content prevents assessment of other security best practices, such as secure forms, vulnerability management, or incident response readiness. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further indicates compliance gaps. The domain's WHOIS data absence is a negative indicator for trust and legitimacy.

Recommendations

  1. Allow legitimate users to access website content beyond the Cloudflare WAF challenge to enable proper analysis and user engagement.
  2. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is available and accurate to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to comply with legal requirements and enhance user confidence.
  4. Provide visible business contact information including emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses to improve credibility.
  5. Implement a comprehensive security and compliance framework including incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Website is behind a Cloudflare security challenge page with Turnstile captcha, blocking access to actual content. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Turnstile, Cloudflare Challenge Platform

Security

Observed score
25/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Cloudflare security challenge
  • Content-Security-Policy header present

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to Cloudflare WAF challenge.
  2. No business or contact information is publicly available.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
  4. No WHOIS registration data available, indicating possible unregistered domain or privacy protection.
  5. Security headers include a strict Content-Security-Policy.
  6. Website relies on Cloudflare for security and bot mitigation.
  7. No analytics, advertising, or tracking scripts detected beyond Cloudflare challenge.
  8. No social media or external business links found.
  9. Website quality and content cannot be assessed due to blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted behind Cloudflare, utilizing their challenge platform and Turnstile captcha for bot protection. The HTML content is minimal and serves only to perform security verification, with no visible CMS or additional technologies detected. The site uses a strict Content-Security-Policy header. Due to the blocking, performance, SEO, accessibility, and mobile optimization cannot be assessed. The lack of WHOIS data and domain registration information is a technical risk and reduces trustworthiness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with keniabeauty.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review keniabeauty.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.