Skip to main content

Security report for keithhacks.cyou

Digital Privacy Corporation · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website keithhacks.cyou is a personal site operated by an individual known as ~keith, who identifies as a queer, trans, cyberpunk anarchist with interests in technology, privacy, and the furry community. The site serves as a hub for personal content, hosting various public services including a Git server, IRC, XMPP, and a Tor mirror, reflecting a strong commitment to privacy and alternative internet culture. The domain is registered to Digital Privacy Corporation in the US, consistent with the site's privacy-focused ethos. Technically, the site is hosted on DigitalOcean and built with standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS (Sass), and JavaScript. The site is mobile-optimized with clear navigation and moderate performance. However, it lacks advanced frameworks or CMS platforms and does not implement DNSSEC or security headers, which are recommended for enhanced security. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and publishes a PGP key for secure communication, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, privacy policies, and incident response information indicates room for improvement in security posture and compliance. No tracking or analytics scripts are present, aligning with the site's privacy values. Overall, the site is a niche personal project with moderate technical maturity and a privacy-conscious approach. Strategic improvements in security headers, DNSSEC, and privacy compliance would enhance trust and security. The site is safe for general audiences with no adult or explicit content detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching keithhacks.cyou

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site targets a niche audience interested in privacy, cyberpunk culture, and the furry fandom. It operates as a small personal project rather than a commercial business, with no evident revenue streams or commercial partnerships. The presence of multiple hosted services suggests technical competence and a community-oriented approach. The domain registration and hosting choices reflect a preference for privacy and control. The lack of formal business information, certifications, or compliance documentation limits its business credibility but aligns with its personal and anarchistic ethos.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and the domain status clientTransferProhibited protects against unauthorized transfers. The publication of a PGP key is a strong privacy and security signal. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, privacy policies, and incident response contacts are notable gaps. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. The site does not use analytics or tracking, reducing privacy risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a personal site but would benefit from adopting best practices to improve resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a privacy policy and cookie policy to enhance GDPR and privacy compliance.
  4. Add an incident response policy and contact information for security issues.
  5. Consider adding accessibility improvements and SEO enhancements for broader reach.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Digital Privacy Corporation
Description
Personal website of ~keith, a queer, trans, cyberpunk anarchist with interests in old computers, programming, electronics projects, and gaming.
Key services
Personal website content, Git server, IRC server, XMPP service, Tor mirror, Streaming
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS (Sass), JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • PGP key published for secure communication

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal site with a strong privacy and alternative internet culture focus.
  2. No commercial or corporate business model detected.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating low compliance with privacy regulations.
  4. No security policy or incident response information published.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating privacy-conscious design.
  6. Content is well-structured with clear navigation and mobile optimization.
  7. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
  8. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with website content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple but effective technology stack with HTML5, CSS (Sass), and JavaScript. Hosting on DigitalOcean provides reliable infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and has clear navigation, but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS platforms. Performance is moderate with no evident technical debt. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers represents a technical risk. No analytics or third-party tracking scripts are used, aligning with privacy goals. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a personal site but could be modernized with additional security and SEO features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with keithhacks.cyou. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review keithhacks.cyou.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.