Skip to main content

Security report for kde.org

KDE e.V. · Technology · Iceland

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and DNS health.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KDE e.V. operates the kde.org website as the central hub for the KDE community, a globally recognized open source software organization focused on developing the KDE Plasma desktop environment and a wide range of applications. The organization is a non-profit entity with a long history dating back to 1996, serving a diverse audience of Linux users, developers, and digital privacy advocates. The website effectively communicates the community's mission, products, and opportunities for involvement and donations. Technically, the site is built using the Hugo static site generator, leveraging modern web technologies such as Bootstrap for responsive design and Matomo for privacy-conscious analytics. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile devices, and accessibility, with comprehensive multilingual support. Security is robust with HTTPS enforced, secure donation forms, and no visible vulnerabilities, although some HTTP security headers could be enhanced. From a security and compliance perspective, the site includes clear privacy and cookie policies aligned with GDPR, but lacks a dedicated security policy or incident response information. The domain registration is privacy-protected but consistent with the organization's non-profit nature and long-standing presence. No suspicious or malicious indicators were found. Overall, kde.org is a professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained website that effectively supports the KDE community's goals. Strategic improvements could include publishing explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and implementing a cookie consent mechanism to further enhance compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kde.org

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
55
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

KDE e.V. holds a strong market position as a leading open source desktop environment and application community. Its business model is community-driven and non-profit, relying on donations, patronage, and partnerships with hardware vendors like Steam Deck and Slimbook. The organization targets Linux users, developers, and advocates for digital freedom and privacy. The website reflects a mature ecosystem with over 200 applications and active community engagement through events and social media. Partnerships with hardware manufacturers and integration with platforms like PayPal for donations indicate a sustainable revenue stream. The presence of KDE Eco highlights a commitment to sustainability, enhancing brand differentiation. Overall, KDE e.V. demonstrates strategic growth and a robust partnership ecosystem.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and secure handling of donation forms. The use of Matomo analytics aligns with privacy-conscious practices. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and a security.txt file indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly present, which could be enhanced to mitigate risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The domain's clientTransferProhibited status adds protection against unauthorized transfers. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, including security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance and user transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KDE e.V.
Description
KDE is an open community of friendly people who want to create a world in which everyone has control over their digital life and enjoys freedom and privacy. The community develops and maintains more than 200 applications for Linux and other platforms.
Key services
Development and distribution of KDE Plasma desktop, Development of KDE Applications, Community support and involvement, Fundraising and donations, Promotion of sustainable software (KDE Eco)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Hugo static site generator, Bootstrap CSS framework, Matomo analytics, JavaScript, WebP images, PayPal donation integration
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Linux, Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure PayPal donation form with validation
  • No inline JavaScript vulnerabilities detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. Strong focus on open source software and community.
  3. Multiple language support with hreflang tags.
  4. Secure HTTPS with no visible security issues.
  5. Donation forms integrated securely via PayPal.
  6. Social media presence across multiple platforms.
  7. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  9. No cookie consent banner despite cookie policy presence.
  10. Use of Matomo analytics indicates privacy-conscious tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern, static site architecture using Hugo, which contributes to fast loading times and high performance. The use of Bootstrap ensures responsive design and good mobile optimization. Matomo analytics is integrated for privacy-respecting user tracking. The site uses modern image formats like WebP for efficient media delivery. Hosting details are not explicit, but DNS is managed via cloudns.net and the domain registrar is NameCheap. The site shows no signs of technical debt or outdated technologies. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and formalize compliance mechanisms. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid, scalable, and well-maintained.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 83/100Low20 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kde.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kde.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.