Skip to main content

Security report for jweiland.net

jweiland.net · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

jweiland.net is a specialized service provider focused on TYPO3 CMS hosting, support, training, and agency projects. Established in 2000, it holds a strong market position as one of the largest TYPO3 hosting providers worldwide, serving over 36,000 TYPO3 domains. The company offers a comprehensive suite of services including cloud hosting, TYPO3 upgrades, ELTS programs, templates, and educational resources such as video tutorials. Their target audience primarily consists of TYPO3 users, businesses, and agencies seeking reliable hosting and expert support. Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 CMS with modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Prism.js, and uses Matomo for privacy-conscious analytics. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and SEO, with structured data enhancing search visibility. Hosting is likely based in Germany, aligning with the stated server location and GDPR compliance focus. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs domain status locks to prevent unauthorized changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism is a minor GDPR compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved with additional headers and policies. The website is professional, trustworthy, and content-rich, with clear contact information and multiple trust indicators such as certifications and testimonials. No adult or questionable content is present, making it suitable for a general audience. The domain registration data is consistent with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jweiland.net

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
95
Email security
65
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jweiland.net, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
63
Employees
0
Customers
61
Third parties
2
Weak passwords
5%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for jweiland.net.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

jweiland.net operates in the niche market of TYPO3 CMS hosting and related services, leveraging its long-standing presence since 2000 to maintain a competitive edge. Its business model centers on providing specialized hosting solutions, technical support, and agency services tailored to TYPO3 users. Revenue streams likely include hosting subscriptions, upgrade services, training, and consulting. The company benefits from strong partnerships within the TYPO3 ecosystem, including Platinum Association membership and Technology Partner status, enhancing credibility and market reach. The multilingual website and extensive resource offerings indicate a strategy to attract a broad international audience. Growth indicators include active news updates and a comprehensive service portfolio. The company maintains a focused operational scope without apparent subsidiaries or parent companies.

Security posture

The security maturity of jweiland.net is moderate to strong. HTTPS is enforced site-wide, and domain registration statuses prevent unauthorized domain transfers or deletions. The use of Matomo analytics with disabled cookies reflects a privacy-conscious approach. However, the lack of DNSSEC implementation and absence of common security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) represent areas for improvement. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The website does not expose sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in its HTML content. Overall, the security posture supports business continuity but would benefit from enhanced DNS security and formalized security governance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve overall DNS security.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner or mechanism to ensure full GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced and maintain up-to-date dependencies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
jweiland.net
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
jweiland.net
Description
Spezialist für TYPO3 Hosting, Support, Schulungen und Projekte mit Fokus auf zuverlässiges Hosting, TYPO3 CMS Beratung und Agenturleistungen.
Key services
Cloud Hosting, TYPO3 CMS Beratung und Support, TYPO3 Upgrades und ELTS Programm, TYPO3 Templates, TYPO3 Agenturleistungen, Video-Anleitungen und Tutorials
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, jQuery 3.6.0, Matomo Analytics, Prism.js, JavaScript ES6+
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited domain statuses
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. Strong focus on TYPO3 CMS hosting and related services.
  3. Multiple language support with hreflang tags for DE, EN, ES.
  4. Use of structured data (JSON-LD) for organization, local business, product ratings.
  5. Contact information is comprehensive and prominently displayed.
  6. No cookie consent banner detected despite GDPR compliance claims.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. Use of Matomo analytics with disabled cookies indicates privacy-conscious tracking.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a mature and widely used open-source content management system, ensuring a robust and scalable platform. The inclusion of jQuery 3.6.0 and Prism.js indicates modern frontend scripting and syntax highlighting capabilities. Matomo analytics is integrated for privacy-respecting user tracking. The site uses responsive design techniques and includes accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels. Performance appears optimized with compressed CSS and JavaScript assets. The multilingual setup with hreflang tags supports international SEO. Hosting is presumably in Germany, aligning with data protection regulations. Technical risks are minimal but include the absence of DNSSEC and some missing security headers, which should be addressed to mitigate potential attack vectors.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jweiland.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jweiland.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.