Skip to main content

Security report for jumpmangaming.com

Jumpman Gaming Ltd. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jumpman Gaming Ltd. is a B2B iGaming company established in 2010, positioning itself as a leading innovator in the casino network industry. The company offers custom-built casino brands and affiliate software solutions, targeting multinational partners and casino networks. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear navigation, catering primarily to business clients in the technology sector of iGaming. Technically, the site is built on WordPress, utilizing common web technologies such as jQuery, Google Analytics, and reCAPTCHA for user tracking and security. Performance and mobile optimization are adequate, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and some security headers present, but could be improved with additional headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies, and no explicit GDPR compliance indicators were found. The lack of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and reduces overall trustworthiness. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance, publishing security and incident response policies, and improving contact transparency to strengthen business credibility and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jumpmangaming.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jumpman Gaming operates in the competitive B2B iGaming market, focusing on providing casino network solutions and affiliate software to multinational partners. The company claims rapid growth and a portfolio of over 150 brands, indicating a scalable business model with a strong emphasis on technology and network management. The website targets business clients rather than consumers, emphasizing innovation and expertise. The absence of detailed business registration or contact information on the site limits external verification but the professional presentation suggests a medium-sized enterprise. The use of analytics and marketing tools like Google Analytics and VWO indicates active digital marketing and user engagement strategies. The company could benefit from greater transparency in regulatory compliance and contact details to enhance market trust and partnership opportunities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enabled and the use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. Content-Security-Policy header is present but other important security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security are missing, which could be added to improve defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in security governance and transparency. The missing WHOIS data also raises questions about domain registration legitimacy, which is a security concern. Overall, while technical security controls are in place, organizational security practices and compliance documentation need enhancement.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional HTTP security headers including X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Add explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers for transparency.
  4. Establish and publish security policies, incident response procedures, and vulnerability disclosure guidelines.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve trust and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jumpman Gaming Ltd.
Description
Leading Innovators in iGaming since 2010. Discover why we're one of the fastest growing B2B Casino Networks around. Our team of experts have custom built and maintained over 150 brands on our network of award winning websites for multinational partners.
Key services
Custom built casino brands, Affiliate software, Network management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, reCAPTCHA, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), FontAwesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA used
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, ExactMetrics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
ClickCease
Tracking pixels
VWO
Marketing tools
VWO, ClickCease
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain not found in registry
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in content
  5. Uses standard analytics and tracking tools
  6. Professional design and clear navigation
  7. No adult or NSFW content detected
  8. Security headers are minimal but HTTPS is enforced
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a technology stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, reCAPTCHA, and Visual Website Optimizer for A/B testing. The site loads multiple external scripts from trusted domains and uses FontAwesome for icons. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph metadata. Accessibility is basic and could be improved with ARIA attributes and better semantic markup. The absence of detailed hosting provider information limits infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jumpmangaming.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jumpmangaming.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.