Skip to main content

Security report for jump24.co.uk

Jump24 · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jump24 is a UK-based software development agency specializing in bespoke software solutions, with expertise in PHP, Laravel, and Vue.js. The company positions itself as an official Laravel partner and Vue expert, targeting businesses across the UK, Europe, and the US. Their services include UX/UI design, tech consultancy, and team augmentation, emphasizing collaboration and client relationships. Technically, the website employs modern frameworks and libraries such as Laravel, Vue.js, Tailwind CSS, and Swiper.js, with tracking via Google Analytics and Tag Manager. The site is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS likely enabled but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Overall, the domain registration data supports legitimacy and consistency with the business claims.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jump24.co.uk

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jump24 operates in the technology sector as a small-sized software development agency founded in 2014. Their market positioning as official Laravel partners and Vue experts provides competitive advantage. The business model focuses on delivering custom software solutions and UX/UI services to a broad client base including large and small companies internationally. The website content and testimonials indicate a strong client relationship focus and a collaborative approach. The company leverages modern web technologies and maintains a professional online presence, though lacks some compliance documentation. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS usage implied but no explicit security headers detected in the provided data. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries, but the absence of security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in security governance. Tracking technologies are present without visible cookie consent, posing privacy compliance risks. The overall security score is moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers, formal policies, and incident response information to enhance security posture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide incident response contact information including security and abuse email addresses.
  5. Incorporate a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jump24
Description
We are a full circle development agency, delivering bespoke software to both the industry and end-customers. Specialising in PHP and Laravel, we work alongside our clients providing flexible UX, Development, Testing and Run Services.
Key services
Laravel development, Vue.js development, UX/UI design, tech consultancy, team augmentation, testing and run services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
PHP, Laravel, Vue.js, Swiper.js, Tailwind CSS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Adobe Typekit fonts
Frameworks
Laravel, Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in provided content
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet
  4. Uses modern web technologies and frameworks
  5. Includes client testimonials and partner claims enhancing trust
  6. No visible security policies or incident response information
  7. Tracking via Google Analytics and Tag Manager present without visible cookie consent mechanism
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Laravel for backend, Vue.js for frontend interactivity, Tailwind CSS for styling, and Swiper.js for UI components. Fonts are served via Adobe Typekit. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing. The site is responsive and well-structured with good SEO meta tags. Hosting provider details are limited to registrar information (123-Reg Limited). Performance is moderate with potential for optimization. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. No CMS detected. Technical risks include lack of visible security headers and incomplete privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 52/100Medium21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jump24.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jump24.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.