Skip to main content

Security report for judicium.sk

JUDICIUM, s. r. o. · Technology · Slovakia

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Email security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JUDICIUM, s. r. o. operates a specialized web application platform focused on managing cybersecurity, personal data protection (GDPR), and anti-money laundering (AML) compliance primarily for Slovak and Czech entities. Their product suite includes modules tailored to legal and regulatory requirements, offering continuous compliance management, risk assessment, documentation generation, and training. The company targets a broad range of obligated entities including businesses, government bodies, and professionals requiring regulatory adherence. Their market position is that of a niche provider with a clear focus on compliance and security solutions. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as Bootstrap and jQuery, with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and integrates a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, though it lacks some advanced security headers and a vulnerability disclosure policy. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy front with transparent business and contact information, supporting a high legitimacy score.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching judicium.sk

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
75
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
100
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention judicium.sk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for judicium.sk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company leverages a subscription-based licensing model with annual fees for access to its compliance modules, supplemented by training services. Their target customers are regulated entities in Slovakia and the Czech Republic, including SMEs and public sector organizations. The business benefits from clear regulatory demand for GDPR, AML, and cybersecurity compliance tools. The presence of detailed company registration and contact data enhances credibility. The partnership with Cookiebot for consent management indicates integration with established privacy tools. No social media presence was detected, suggesting a focus on direct business relationships rather than broad marketing. The company appears to maintain a lean operational size with specialized offerings, positioning itself as a trusted compliance partner in its regional market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid baseline security posture with enforced HTTPS and a user-friendly cookie consent mechanism that respects GDPR requirements. The presence of disabled checkboxes for necessary cookies and granular consent options reflects good privacy practices. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security hardening. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response contact is provided via a dedicated support email. The lack of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy is a minor gap. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business context but could be improved with additional headers and formal vulnerability disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are included.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with WCAG standards and broaden user inclusivity.
  5. Consider adding social media or professional network links to improve brand visibility and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
JUDICIUM, s. r. o.
VAT number
SK2023062954
Registration number
99153/B
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JUDICIUM, s. r. o.
Description
Webová aplikácia s modulmi pre správu kybernetickej bezpečnosti, ochrany osobných údajov a ochrany pred legalizáciou príjmov z trestnej činnosti.
Key services
JUDICIUM GDPR, JUDICIUM AML, JUDICIUM CYBERSEC
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Swiper, Masonry
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • Disabled checkbox for necessary cookies

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot session tracker
Marketing tools
Cookiebot consent management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides clear business and contact information.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed user controls.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  4. Professional presentation with clear GDPR and security focus.
  5. No social media links detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a classic web stack with jQuery and Bootstrap for UI components, supported by Masonry for layout management. The site loads asynchronously the Cookiebot consent management scripts, indicating a modern approach to privacy compliance. Performance is moderate, with no explicit performance optimization scripts detected. The site is mobile responsive and has basic SEO meta tags but lacks advanced structured data like JSON-LD for business or product schema. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization in SEO and security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with judicium.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review judicium.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.