Skip to main content

Security report for jspm.io

c/o whoisproxy.com · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JSPM.IO operates as a specialized CDN package provider supporting the JSPM project, targeting developers and technology users requiring efficient package delivery. The website presents a clean, modern interface with clear branding and links to the main JSPM project site, indicating a focused business model within the technology sector. The domain has been registered since 2013 and uses reputable infrastructure partners such as CacheFly and Cloudflare, supporting its market position as a niche service provider. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript features including import maps and leverages Cloudflare DNS and CacheFly hosting infrastructure, resulting in fast performance and good mobile optimization. SEO metadata is well implemented, though accessibility features are basic. The absence of CMS or analytics scripts suggests a lightweight, performance-oriented design. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and has domain status protections to prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions. However, it lacks DNSSEC, explicit security headers, and published security policies or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. No contact information or privacy/cookie policies are provided, which limits compliance and user trust. The WHOIS data is privacy protected but consistent with a legitimate technology service. Overall, JSPM.IO is a technically sound and professionally presented website serving a clear technology niche. The main risks relate to privacy compliance and security transparency, which could be improved to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of jspm.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jspm.io

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

JSPM.IO is positioned as a technology service provider specializing in CDN package delivery for the JSPM ecosystem. Its competitive advantage lies in its integration with the JSPM project and use of high-performance infrastructure partners. The business model focuses on providing reliable package delivery services to developers and technology users. The absence of direct contact information and policies suggests a lean operation, possibly supported by the broader JSPM community. Growth indicators include a long domain age and partnerships with CacheFly and Cloudflare. The partnership ecosystem is limited but strategic, focusing on infrastructure and project alignment.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections in place. However, the lack of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security or incident response policies indicates gaps in security best practices. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency and incident response readiness. The absence of contact channels for security incidents reduces the ability to handle potential threats effectively. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small technology service but would benefit from enhancements to align with industry standards and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing
  2. Implement and publish privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust
  3. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident contacts or abuse emails
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
c/o whoisproxy.com
Description
CDN Package Provider for the JSPM Project
Key services
CDN package delivery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, importmap, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by https URLs)
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a technical landing page for a CDN package provider related to JSPM project
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the landing page
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or forms detected
  4. Uses Cloudflare DNS and CacheFly infrastructure sponsor
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  7. WHOIS data is privacy protected but domain age and DNS status indicate legitimacy
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
  9. Website is well structured with modern importmap usage and good SEO metadata
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern JavaScript features including import maps and serves content over HTTPS with Cloudflare DNS and CacheFly hosting, resulting in fast load times and good mobile optimization. The site is lightweight with no detected CMS or analytics scripts, reducing attack surface and improving performance. SEO metadata is well implemented, though accessibility features are basic. The absence of security headers and DNSSEC represents technical debt that could be addressed to improve security posture. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could be enhanced with additional security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100 −3Medium35 findingsView report
  2. 61/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jspm.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jspm.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.