Skip to main content

Security report for jordiplz.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website jordiplz.com represents a seasoned Principal Product Designer offering a range of design services including product strategy, UX flows, UI systems, prototyping, design systems, and collaboration. The site targets founders and startup teams seeking expert design partnership. The business model is that of an independent consultant with a strong portfolio and reputable client list, positioning well in the technology sector. Technically, the site is built with modern web standards, uses privacy-conscious analytics (Plausible), and is optimized for mobile and accessibility. However, the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies and the use of a personal email for contact reduce compliance maturity. Security posture is moderate with no visible vulnerabilities but lacks advanced security headers and formal policies. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency despite the professional site presence. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from improved privacy disclosures and WHOIS transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jordiplz.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site serves as a personal branding and service platform for an experienced product designer with over 12 years in the field. The client portfolio includes major companies like Spotify, Klarna, and the European Commission, indicating strong market positioning and credibility. The business operates as a small independent consultancy focusing on high-quality, hands-on design services for startups and founders. Revenue likely derives from project-based engagements. The partnership ecosystem includes Appinspo, a related design trends platform also coded by the owner. Growth indicators include active portfolio updates and integration of modern web technologies. The business model emphasizes quality over volume, targeting a niche market of founders needing expert design leadership.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. There are no forms collecting sensitive data, reducing attack surface. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were found. However, the lack of privacy and cookie policies and absence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts indicate gaps in compliance and security culture. The missing WHOIS data reduces trust and may indicate privacy protection or registration issues. Overall, the site is low risk but could improve by adopting security best practices such as security headers, formal policies, and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Provide vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information to build trust and readiness.
  4. Use a company domain email for contact instead of a personal Gmail address to improve business credibility.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain registration transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Principal Product Designer with 12+ years of experience designing products where beauty, function, and harmony meet.
Key services
Product Strategy / Discovery, User Experience / Flows, Interface Design / Visual Systems, Prototyping / Testing, Design Systems, Handoff & Collaboration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Intl.DateTimeFormat API, Plausible Analytics
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS implied by og:url and twitter:url with https scheme
  • No forms collecting sensitive data
  • No exposed credentials or sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal portfolio for an experienced product designer.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact email is a personal Gmail address, not a company domain email.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses provided.
  5. No forms present on the site.
  6. Site uses Plausible Analytics for privacy-focused tracking.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data.
  9. Site is mobile optimized and visually professional.
  10. WHOIS data is missing or domain unregistered according to raw WHOIS output.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with clean, modern HTML5 and CSS3, using a custom font from cdnfonts.com and a privacy-focused analytics script from plausible.io. JavaScript is used for UI interactions and a digital clock feature. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with good accessibility features such as keyboard navigation and ARIA attributes. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is likely fast given minimal external dependencies and lightweight design. The site lacks advanced frameworks or heavy libraries, reducing technical debt and complexity. Opportunities exist to enhance SEO with structured data and improve security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jordiplz.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jordiplz.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.