Skip to main content

Security report for join.me

GoTo · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GoTo is a leading enterprise software company specializing in web conferencing, online meetings, and business communications solutions. Their flagship product, GoTo Meeting, offers a secure, reliable, and feature-rich platform for virtual collaboration, targeting businesses of all sizes globally. The company operates under the parent company LogMeIn, Inc., and maintains a strong market position with a broad suite of related products including GoTo Connect, GoTo Webinar, and GoTo Training. Their offerings emphasize enterprise-grade security, compliance with regulations such as HIPAA and GDPR, and high availability with a 99.999% uptime SLA. Technically, the website leverages modern technologies including Microsoft .NET SDK, Google Tag Manager, Google Optimize, and TrustArc for consent management. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, with comprehensive SEO and structured data implementations. Analytics and marketing tools are used responsibly with clear consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, GoTo demonstrates strong practices including HTTPS enforcement, encrypted sessions, single sign-on, and meeting security features like locks and password protection. However, explicit vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact details are not publicly evident, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the website and business present a low-risk profile with high professionalism, strong trust indicators, and compliance adherence. Strategic recommendations include enhancing transparency around security disclosures and incident response, and maintaining continuous monitoring of security posture to uphold enterprise trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching join.me

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
20
Email security
77
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention join.me, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
50,889
Employees
4
Customers
50,843
Third parties
42
Weak passwords
15%

Latest record dated 2026-06-08 · 16 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for join.me.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –join.me2026-06-08
  • –join.me2025-12-06
  • –www.join.me2025-04-20
  • –www.join.me2025-04-14

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GoTo operates in the competitive SaaS market for business communications and collaboration, leveraging its legacy and parent company LogMeIn's resources. Their business model focuses on subscription-based services with tiered plans catering to various business sizes and needs. The company targets enterprises, SMBs, and professional services sectors, emphasizing security and compliance as differentiators. Partnerships with LogMeIn and integration of acquired products like join.me expand their ecosystem. The website content and navigation reflect a mature marketing strategy with clear segmentation by industry, business needs, and types. Growth indicators include new webinar hubs, AI-powered features, and global phone support. The company maintains a strong partner program and developer center, indicating an open ecosystem approach.

Security posture

GoTo's security posture is robust, featuring enterprise-grade encryption, meeting security controls, and compliance with HIPAA and GDPR. The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern security headers (implied). Security best practices such as meeting locks, password protection, and end-to-end encryption are highlighted. However, the absence of a public vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file and lack of explicit incident response contact channels are gaps. The use of third-party consent management (TrustArc) and analytics tools is managed with user consent. Overall, the security maturity is high but could be improved with more transparency and direct security communication channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses) on the website.
  3. Enhance transparency by listing security certifications and audit reports publicly.
  4. Maintain and regularly update cookie and privacy policies to reflect evolving regulations.
  5. Continue investing in security awareness and trust-building content to reinforce enterprise confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GoTo
Description
GoTo Meeting ensures a quality web conferencing experience by offering the virtual meeting platform features your business needs.
Key services
GoTo Meeting (video conferencing), GoTo Connect (business communications), GoTo Webinar, GoTo Training, Remote Access & Support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Microsoft .NET SDK (dotnet_sdk_1.4.22), Google Tag Manager, Google Optimize, AB Tasty, Qualified chat widget, Microsoft Application Insights, YouTube Player API
Frameworks
Schema.org JSON-LD structured data, Google Tag Manager, TrustArc consent management
Platforms
YouTube, TrustArc, Google Analytics (implied via GTM), Qualified (chat)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Enterprise-grade security claims
  • Meeting lock and password protection features
  • AES 256-bit encryption for video and data at rest
  • Single sign-on support
  • Dismiss attendees feature

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Application Insights, AB Tasty
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
AB Tasty
Tracking pixels
Google Optimize, Microsoft Application Insights
Marketing tools
Qualified chat, TrustArc consent management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Strong focus on security and compliance with HIPAA and GDPR
  3. Comprehensive product and solution offerings for business communications and collaboration
  4. Multiple trust signals including testimonials and uptime SLA
  5. Robust cookie consent and privacy management via TrustArc
  6. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools
  7. Clear navigation and mobile optimization
  8. No signs of suspicious or malicious content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Microsoft .NET SDK, Google Tag Manager, and TrustArc for consent management. It uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and rich snippets, and integrates third-party services like YouTube and Qualified chat. Performance is optimized with font preloading and asynchronous script loading. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with clear navigation and well-structured content. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical implementation supports a fast, secure, and user-friendly experience with minimal technical debt visible.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with join.me. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review join.me.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.