Skip to main content

Security report for jekabpilsudens.lv

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at jekabpilsudens.lv currently serves as a security checkpoint page implemented by BitNinja, requiring visitors to complete a CAPTCHA challenge to verify they are not automated bots. This indicates the site is protected by a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or similar security mechanism that restricts direct access to content until validation is complete. The page includes multilingual support for the CAPTCHA instructions but lacks substantive business content, contact information, or legal policies. Technically, the site uses Google reCAPTCHA and Google Analytics scripts, with meta tags referencing outdated CMS versions (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5), suggesting legacy or placeholder content. The security posture is moderate due to the presence of CAPTCHA and IP greylisting but lacks visible security headers and comprehensive privacy or cookie policies. Overall, the site is currently inaccessible for normal browsing, limiting the ability to assess business operations or content quality.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jekabpilsudens.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the site functioning as a security challenge page, no direct business information, company identity, or market positioning can be discerned. The presence of BitNinja branding indicates reliance on third-party security services for bot mitigation. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses are provided. The business model appears focused on protecting the underlying website from automated threats rather than direct customer engagement. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the content.

Security posture

The security implementation includes a CAPTCHA challenge and IP greylisting managed by BitNinja, which is a positive control against automated attacks. However, the absence of standard security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, HSTS) and lack of visible privacy or cookie policies reduce compliance and security maturity. The site uses HTTPS as implied by external script sources but SSL configuration details are not provided. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data are visible in the HTML content. Incident response contacts or security policies are not disclosed, limiting transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and expose standard security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  2. Upgrade or remove outdated CMS references to reduce technical debt and potential vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements to improve legal compliance.
  4. Provide accessible contact information including security incident response channels to build trust.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve user experience and site discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

BitNinja detected. This is a security challenge page by BitNinja to block and validate visitors via CAPTCHA before granting access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
This page is a security CAPTCHA challenge page designed to validate visitors are not automated bots before allowing access to the requested content.
Key services
CAPTCHA validation, IP greylist management
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google reCAPTCHA, BitNinja security services
Frameworks
Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5 (meta tags only)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation
  • IP greylist management via BitNinja

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is a CAPTCHA challenge page, not a full business site.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business details provided.
  4. Uses BitNinja security service for bot mitigation.
  5. Includes Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts.
  6. CMS meta tags indicate Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5 but no active CMS detected.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations.
  8. No WHOIS data provided; domain likely privacy protected.
  9. Website is blocked by security mechanism; analysis limited.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses a basic HTML structure with inline CSS and JavaScript for multilingual support and CAPTCHA integration. The tech stack includes Google reCAPTCHA and Google Analytics for security and tracking. Meta tags indicate Joomla and WordPress CMS usage, but these appear outdated and likely not active. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no advanced ARIA or semantic HTML features detected. The site is hosted behind BitNinja security services, which enforce CAPTCHA challenges to mitigate automated threats. Technical debt is indicated by legacy CMS references and lack of modern security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jekabpilsudens.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jekabpilsudens.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.