Skip to main content

Security report for jamx.ai

Technology · Iceland

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JAMX.ai appears to be a newly established technology-focused website, likely a startup founded in 2023, with a domain registered under privacy protection in Iceland. The website employs modern JavaScript technologies and integrates multiple analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), FullStory, and Reddit Pixel. The site includes a cookie consent mechanism powered by CookiePro, indicating some level of privacy compliance, though no explicit privacy policy or terms of service are found on the main page. The technical infrastructure is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Overall, the website is functional and professional but lacks comprehensive compliance and contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jamx.ai

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
88
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind JAMX.ai is likely a small technology startup operating in the AI or podcasting space, suggested by the presence of a podcast player script and technology-related tags. The domain age and privacy-protected WHOIS data align with a new entrant in the market. The absence of detailed business information, contact details, or certifications limits the ability to fully assess market positioning or revenue streams. The use of multiple tracking and marketing tools suggests a focus on user engagement and growth. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the domain or website content.

Security posture

Security maturity is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protection, which are positive indicators. However, the lack of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security or incident response policies indicates room for improvement. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, and no contact channels for security incidents are provided. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces potential privacy risks. Overall, the site is not exposed to critical vulnerabilities based on available data but would benefit from enhanced security practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing attacks.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information, including a security.txt file.
  5. Provide clear contact information including company email and phone number to improve business credibility and user support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, FullStory, Reddit Pixel, CookiePro
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), FullStory, Reddit Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Reddit Pixel, FullStory
Marketing tools
Google Analytics (via GTM), FullStory, Reddit Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern JavaScript and tracking technologies
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main page
  3. Cookie consent mechanism implemented via CookiePro
  4. No direct contact information or business address found on homepage
  5. Domain is newly registered with privacy protection
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. Website content is minimal and mostly technical scripts and styles
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack with integration of analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, FullStory, and Reddit Pixel. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses CookiePro for cookie consent management. Hosting appears to be managed via NameCheap with registrar DNS servers. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic SEO meta tags. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No CMS or major frameworks are explicitly detected. The site lacks advanced SEO structured data or Open Graph metadata. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a startup but could be enhanced with better SEO and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jamx.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jamx.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.