Skip to main content

Security report for jamwd.com

JAM Web Designs, Inc. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JAM Web Designs, Inc. operates the website jamwd.com as a parent company for several niche web design brands specializing in cheerleading, dance, gymnastics, and church websites. The business model focuses on providing tailored website design and class management software solutions to these specific communities. The website itself serves primarily as a landing page linking to its subsidiaries, with minimal direct content or interactive features. Technically, the site is built with basic HTML and CSS, lacking modern frameworks or CMS platforms. There is no evidence of advanced analytics, tracking, or advertising technologies. Security posture is weak due to absence of HTTPS information, DNSSEC, and security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are published. The domain is well-established since 2006, indicating business longevity and legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional but basic, with significant room for improvement in security, privacy compliance, and content richness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jamwd.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets niche markets within the sports and religious sectors, leveraging specialized subsidiary brands to address distinct customer segments. This focused approach may provide competitive advantages in these verticals. The lack of visible contact information or detailed business disclosures on the main site limits transparency. Revenue streams likely derive from web design services and software subscriptions. The partnership ecosystem is internal, with subsidiaries clearly linked. Growth indicators are not evident from the site content. Strategic observations suggest the company could benefit from enhanced digital presence, improved compliance documentation, and stronger security measures to build trust and expand market reach.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low. Key vulnerabilities include lack of HTTPS confirmation, no DNSSEC, absence of security headers, and no published security or incident response policies. These gaps expose the business to risks such as data interception, domain hijacking, and reduced customer trust. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is not demonstrated. Incident response readiness is unknown due to missing contact channels. The security culture appears minimal based on public-facing information. Addressing these issues is critical to safeguarding business operations and customer data.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Enable DNSSEC to protect domain name system integrity and prevent spoofing.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to meet legal compliance and inform users.
  4. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and incident reporting.
  5. Incorporate security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JAM Web Designs, Inc.
Description
The parent company of JAMSpiritSites.com, PepStep.com, ChalkJock.com, and SowTheSpirit.com, providing specialized website design services for cheerleading, dance, gymnastics, and church organizations.
Key services
Class Management Software, Cheerleading Websites, Dance Websites, Gymnastics Websites, Church Websites
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a holding/landing page with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses provided.
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected.
  5. No social media links or analytics/tracking scripts found.
  6. Website uses basic HTML and CSS with no advanced frameworks or CMS detected.
  7. No HTTPS or security headers information available; security posture is weak.
  8. Subsidiary domains are clearly linked and consistent with business description.
  9. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
  10. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML and CSS without modern frameworks or CMS, indicating low technical complexity. Hosting details are limited to registrar information, with no explicit hosting provider identified. Performance is likely moderate given minimal content and assets. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no advanced features detected. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meta keywords, no sitemap, and robots meta tag set to 'noindex,follow', which prevents indexing by search engines. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking tools, which limits insights into user behavior. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist to improve user experience, security, and search visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jamwd.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jamwd.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.