Skip to main content

Security report for itcamp.lv

IT Camp · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IT Camp is a specialized IT recruitment and HR consulting company based in Latvia, offering guaranteed delivery of 3-5 resumes per vacancy within one month. The company targets employers struggling to fill IT positions and candidates seeking IT jobs, providing additional services such as relocation assistance. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence with multilingual support and client testimonials, positioning IT Camp as a trusted niche player in the recruitment market. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor, leveraging modern web technologies and tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Microsoft Clarity. Privacy compliance is well addressed with cookie consent and privacy policies implemented via Iubenda. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced, though explicit security headers could be improved. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits but the domain appears privacy protected, which is justified for this business type. Overall, IT Camp presents a credible, professional online presence with moderate technical maturity and good privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching itcamp.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
85
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

IT Camp operates in the technology sector focusing on IT recruitment and HR consulting services. Its business model is service-based, providing recruitment guarantees and relocation support, targeting both employers and candidates. The company maintains a small-sized operation with a clear market niche. The website content and social media presence indicate active engagement and trust-building efforts. The use of multilingual support expands its reach in the Baltic region. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests a preference for controlled communication channels via forms and social media. The company leverages modern marketing and analytics tools to optimize outreach and client acquisition. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data provided.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates privacy and cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting a baseline security and compliance posture. Tracking and analytics scripts are used responsibly with user consent. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not detected, representing an area for improvement. No signs of vulnerabilities, malware, or exposed sensitive information were found in the HTML content. The absence of a public security policy or incident response information limits transparency in security governance. WHOIS privacy protection is enabled, which is appropriate for the business type. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for enhancement in header policies and incident response disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider adding direct verified contact emails and phone numbers for improved business credibility and user trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IT Camp
Description
IT Camp is an IT recruitment and HR consulting company that guarantees 3-5 resumes for vacancies within 1 month, specializing in filling difficult vacancies and providing personnel selection guarantees.
Key services
IT recruitment, HR consulting, Relocation services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Google Fonts, Font Awesome, Iubenda Cookie Solution, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, WPML (multilingual plugin)
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security and privacy scripts (Iubenda)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM), LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is focused on IT recruitment and HR consulting with clear service offerings.
  3. Multilingual support for English, Latvian, and Russian languages.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and tracking tools.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with consent mechanisms.
  6. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found; contact primarily via forms and social media.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limits; domain appears privacy protected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder, incorporating modern fonts (Gilroy, Roboto) and icon sets (Font Awesome, Iconsax). It uses multiple third-party scripts for analytics and marketing, including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site is multilingual, supported by WPML plugin, and uses Iubenda for privacy and cookie compliance. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of styles and scripts. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and adaptive font sizes. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No hosting provider details were extracted. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and adequate for a small professional service website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with itcamp.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review itcamp.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.