Skip to main content

Security report for ipmeta.io

IpMeta.io · Technology · Iceland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IpMeta.io is a small technology company founded in 2019 that offers a specialized Google Analytics plugin to restore and enhance network-related dimensions such as 'Service Provider' and 'Network Domain' which were removed by Google Analytics in 2020. The company targets website owners and digital marketers who rely on Google Analytics for detailed network insights. IpMeta provides a freemium business model with free and premium plans, including advanced company identification features in the premium tier. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good mobile optimization, leveraging modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Analytics, and third-party chat and tracking services. Hosting assets are served via Amazon S3, and DNS is managed through Cloudflare.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of ipmeta.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ipmeta.io

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ipmeta.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
11
Employees
0
Customers
11
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ipmeta.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

IpMeta occupies a niche market segment focused on enhancing Google Analytics capabilities by restoring lost network dimension data and adding new dimensions like 'Network Type'. Its freemium SaaS model allows users to access basic features for free with limits, while premium plans offer enhanced identification and ease of installation. The company demonstrates moderate market positioning with a clear value proposition for analytics users. The presence on Product Hunt and integration with popular analytics and marketing tools indicate a growth-oriented approach. However, the lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies and limited contact information may impact trust and compliance perceptions.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses clientTransferProhibited domain status, indicating basic security hygiene. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, and there is no published security policy or incident response information. The company claims to use a proprietary WHOIS database and does not store visitor IP addresses, which is positive for privacy. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file suggests room for improvement in transparency and incident handling readiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with formal policies and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve privacy compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and document security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Provide clear and accessible contact information including security incident contacts.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IpMeta.io
Description
IpMeta provides a free Google Analytics plugin that restores the 'Service Provider' and 'Network Domain' dimensions removed by Google Analytics in 2020. It also offers a bonus 'Network Type' dimension to enhance analytics filtering capabilities.
Key services
Google Analytics plugin for network dimensions, Service Provider and Network Domain data restoration, Network Type dimension for advanced filtering, Premium plan with enhanced company identification
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics (gtag.js, GTM), jQuery, Bootstrap, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Crisp Chat, Snitcher tracking, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No third-party WHOIS data usage (proprietary WHOIS database)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Snitcher
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Snitcher
Marketing tools
Crisp Chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides a niche Google Analytics plugin service.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and third-party services for analytics and chat.
  5. Domain uses privacy protection but is not suspicious.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. Site is accessible without WAF blocking or challenge.
  8. Content is professional and focused on analytics enhancement.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics tracking. Hosting is via Amazon S3 for static assets, and DNS is managed by Cloudflare, providing reliable infrastructure. The site loads with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, accessibility features are basic and SEO optimization could be improved with more comprehensive meta tags and structured data. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. The technical implementation is solid but has opportunities for modernization and enhanced security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium29 findingsView report
  2. 68/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ipmeta.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ipmeta.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.