Skip to main content

Security report for ipfoxy.net

IPFoxy · Technology · China

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IPFoxy is a technology company specializing in providing global proxy IP services, including dynamic and static residential proxies, as well as data center IPv4 and IPv6 proxies. Founded in 2023, the company positions itself as a leading provider with a large pool of real residential IPs and a focus on security, stability, and scalability for online business growth. Their offerings cater to enterprises and individuals requiring reliable proxy solutions for various use cases such as social networks, e-commerce, data aggregation, and advertising. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Nuxt.js and Tailwind CSS, hosted with reputable providers including Alibaba Cloud and AWS DNS services. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, SEO practices, and moderate performance. However, some security best practices like security headers and DNSSEC are not implemented, and privacy compliance features such as cookie consent and privacy policies are missing. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data, but lacks explicit security policies and incident response contacts. The domain registration is consistent with the business claims, registered recently with a reputable registrar. No WAF or blocking mechanisms are detected, allowing full content access. Overall, IPFoxy presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security hardening. Strategic enhancements in these areas would strengthen user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ipfoxy.net

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ipfoxy.net, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
106
Employees
0
Customers
106
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
6%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ipfoxy.net.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

IPFoxy operates in the proxy IP service market, targeting businesses and individuals needing proxy solutions for online activities. Their competitive advantage lies in a large real residential IP pool, multiple proxy types, and global coverage. The business model includes monthly and traffic-based pricing, appealing to diverse customer needs. The company maintains active social media channels and has accumulated positive customer ratings, indicating market acceptance and growth potential. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not explicitly identified. The company is relatively new, founded in 2023, and focuses on technology sector services.

Security posture

The security posture of IPFoxy is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS and uses asynchronous loading for scripts, reducing some attack vectors. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap. No public security or incident response policies are found, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency to improve resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  4. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities and maintain secure infrastructure.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IPFoxy
Description
IPFoxy 是全球优质动静态代理IP服务提供商，致力于为客户提供安全、稳定、高速的代理解决方案，让您的线上业务获得无限规模化增长的机会。
Key services
动态住宅代理, 静态IPv4代理, 静态IPv6代理, 独享ISP住宅代理
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Nuxt.js, Tailwind CSS, JavaScript, AWS Route 53 (inferred from AWS DNS servers)
Frameworks
Vue.js (Nuxt.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Salesmartly chat widget
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is primarily in Chinese with some English alternate URLs
  3. Business focuses on proxy IP services with multiple product offerings
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on main page
  5. Contact email support@ipfoxy.com is provided in structured data
  6. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  7. Presence of social media links and customer ratings enhances trust
  8. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack centered on Nuxt.js (Vue.js framework) and Tailwind CSS for styling, indicating a contemporary front-end approach. Hosting and DNS services are provided by Alibaba Cloud and AWS Route 53 respectively, ensuring reliable infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. No CMS detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based site. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of DNSSEC, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface and improve trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ipfoxy.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ipfoxy.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.