Skip to main content

Security report for invoicer.lv

InvoiceR · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

InvoiceR.lv is a Latvian-based SaaS platform specializing in simple invoice generation and client management for small and medium businesses, private entrepreneurs, and accountants. Founded in 2016, it offers a freemium model with tiered subscription plans providing features such as invoice creation, client and service management, monthly invoice automation, and API integration. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation and pricing transparency. The platform targets Russian and Latvian-speaking markets primarily. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap 4, jQuery, Google Fonts, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, and Microsoft Clarity. The site is served over HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks some advanced security headers. Performance is moderate with lazy loading implemented for images. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the site lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy and cookie consent banner present but no detailed GDPR compliance statements or data retention policies. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional business presence with moderate technical maturity and security posture. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing detailed security and privacy policies, and providing incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching invoicer.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

InvoiceR.lv occupies a niche in the invoicing SaaS market focused on small and medium enterprises and private entrepreneurs in Latvia and Russian-speaking regions. Its competitive advantage lies in simplicity, automation features, and API integration. Revenue streams are subscription-based with a free tier to attract users. The company maintains partnerships with various local businesses, enhancing its ecosystem. Growth indicators include multi-language support and expanding feature sets. The business model is straightforward SaaS with clear pricing tiers. Strategic observations suggest focusing on compliance and security enhancements to strengthen market position and trust.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is basic with cookie consent but lacks detailed GDPR adherence documentation. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Business impact of these gaps includes potential trust erosion and regulatory risk. Enhancing security policies, incident response readiness, and privacy transparency is recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish detailed security and privacy policies outlining data protection practices and GDPR compliance.
  3. Establish and publicize incident response contacts and procedures to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
  5. Enhance data protection officer visibility or contact information to comply with data protection regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
InvoiceR
Description
InvoiceR.lv is a simple invoice generation system created in 2016 to assist small businesses and private clients. It offers features such as client management, service listings, invoice creation and storage, monthly invoice automation, and integration with Redmine for work tracking. Basic registration and minimal features are free, with paid plans for advanced functionality.
Key services
Invoice creation and storage, Client and service management, Monthly invoice automation, API and backend integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.6.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Fonts (Nunito Sans, Quicksand), Vanilla LazyLoad, Yandex Metrika, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Microsoft Clarity, JivoSite chat widget
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JS libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Yandex Metrika, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
JivoSite chat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Russian language.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. Multiple pricing plans with clear feature differentiation.
  4. Contact information includes physical address in Riga, Latvia, phone, and email.
  5. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tools with consent banner present.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected.
  8. No data protection officer contact found.
  9. Good branding consistency and professional design.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is built on a modern tech stack featuring Bootstrap 4, jQuery, and Google Fonts, ensuring responsive design and good user experience. Lazy loading of images improves performance. Integration with multiple analytics platforms (Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Microsoft Clarity) and marketing tools (Google Ads, JivoSite chat) indicates a mature digital marketing approach. However, the absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or static site architecture, which may limit scalability. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which may introduce vulnerabilities or privacy concerns. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility features to enhance overall technical robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with invoicer.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review invoicer.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.