Skip to main content

Security report for invoiceberry.com

Invoiceberry Limited · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

InvoiceBerry is a UK-based small business SaaS company specializing in online invoicing software tailored for freelancers and small businesses. The platform offers invoice creation, expense tracking, payment management, and integrates with popular payment gateways. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear business and contact information, including customer testimonials that reinforce trust. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Cloudfront CDN, with analytics tools like Plausible and Facebook Pixel for user tracking. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and secure forms, though no explicit security headers or incident response contacts are published. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms, indicating GDPR compliance. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces trust but the overall business presence and content quality support legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching invoiceberry.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention invoiceberry.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3,553
Employees
8
Customers
3,519
Third parties
26
Weak passwords
15%

Latest record dated 2026-06-15 · 109 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for invoiceberry.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –invoiceberry.com2026-06-15
  • –invoiceberry.com2026-06-09
  • –cl155379.invoiceberry.com2026-05-26
  • –.invoiceberry.com2026-01-12
  • –invoiceberry.com2025-08-08

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

InvoiceBerry targets small businesses and freelancers seeking simple invoicing solutions, positioning itself as an easy-to-use alternative to complex accounting software. Its business model is subscription-based with free trials and tiered paid plans. The company leverages affiliate partnerships and maintains a help center to support customers. The website content and testimonials suggest a stable user base of over 100,000 customers. The use of multiple marketing and analytics tools indicates a mature digital marketing strategy. However, the lack of visible WHOIS data and security policy documents suggests areas for improvement in transparency and compliance.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure login and signup forms, with claims of 256-bit AES SSL encryption for data protection. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting privacy compliance. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected, and no public security or incident response policies are available. The presence of multiple third-party scripts introduces potential risk vectors that require regular auditing. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing security policies, adding security headers, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from external libraries.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all users.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Invoiceberry Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Invoiceberry Limited
Description
InvoiceBerry provides simple and effective online invoicing software for small businesses and freelancers, enabling invoice creation, expense tracking, and payment management.
Key services
Online invoicing, Expense tracking, Payment tracking, Invoice templates, Online payment integration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, Cloudfront CDN, Plausible Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Gist (chat/CRM widget), ConvertBox, Reflio
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure login and signup forms
  • Use of 256-bit AES SSL encryption (claimed)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Gist CRM widget, ConvertBox
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  3. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Multiple customer testimonials and trust signals present.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts found.
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for interactivity, and FontAwesome for icons. It uses Amazon Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, improving performance and availability. Analytics and marketing tools such as Plausible, Facebook Pixel, Gist CRM widget, and ConvertBox are integrated for user tracking and engagement. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. However, no CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements possible by optimizing third-party scripts and enhancing accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with invoiceberry.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review invoiceberry.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.