Skip to main content

Security report for innovis.ai

Innovis · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Innovis is a technology company specializing in automation, digitalization, and security solutions primarily for logistics, retail, real estate, and municipal sectors. Backed by its parent company M2C, Innovis offers a range of services including automated reception systems, perimeter security, remote monitoring, and energy optimization. The company positions itself as a technological partner from concept through implementation, targeting medium to large enterprises in the Czech Republic and surrounding regions. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and integrates modern marketing and analytics tools with GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies. Technically, the site runs on WordPress with integrations such as Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, and Smartlook for user behavior analytics. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and spam protection, though improvements could be made by enabling DNSSEC and publishing explicit security policies. Overall, Innovis presents a credible and trustworthy digital presence aligned with its business objectives.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching innovis.ai

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
73
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Innovis operates in a competitive technology market focused on facility management and security automation. Its partnership with Good Sailors enhances its software development capabilities, allowing for tailored IT solutions. The company leverages its parent M2C's established market presence to build trust and expand its client base. Key competitive advantages include a broad portfolio of smart technologies, long-term client relationships, and a focus on sustainability and ESG principles. Revenue streams likely derive from technology sales, service contracts, and consulting. The target customers are enterprises requiring integrated security and operational efficiency solutions. Growth indicators include active participation in industry conferences and trade shows, as well as continuous content updates in their magazine section.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, use of reCAPTCHA on forms, and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of security headers and DNSSEC implementation are areas for improvement. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. The use of multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts increases the attack surface but is managed with user consent. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adopting a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Innovis
Description
Pomáháme klientům k efektivnějšímu, bezpečnějšímu a plynulejšímu provozu díky inovativním technologiím automatizace a digitalizace. Jsme vaším technologickým partnerem od prvotního nápadu přes vývoj až po implementaci řešení.
Key services
Automatická recepce, Automatická vrátnice, Zabezpečení areálů a budov, Bezpečnostní technologie, Digitalizace procesů, Pult centrální ochrany, Vzdálený monitoring, Energetická optimalizace provozu budov
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google Ads, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight, reCAPTCHA v2, Smartlook
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Smartlook
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Pixel
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel, Smartlook
Marketing tools
CookieHub
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and professionally designed.
  2. Content is primarily in Czech with multilingual support.
  3. Strong emphasis on technology-driven security and automation solutions.
  4. Good integration of marketing and analytics tools with user consent.
  5. Contact form includes validation and reCAPTCHA for spam prevention.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  7. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a custom theme and uses modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight, and Smartlook. The site is multilingual, optimized for mobile devices, and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with video content and multiple external scripts potentially impacting load times. The hosting is managed by a Czech provider with domain registration through NETIM SAS. The technical stack is current but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with innovis.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review innovis.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.