Skip to main content

Security report for innerworks.me

Innerworks · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Innerworks is a technology company specializing in advanced user intelligence solutions aimed at preventing fraud and ensuring regulatory compliance for online platforms such as exchanges, launchpads, and payment services. Their core offerings include device fingerprinting, VPN detection, and geocompliance, supported by an ethical hacking platform called RedTeam. The company positions itself as a market leader in fraud prevention technology with a focus on seamless user experience and privacy. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Fonts, Typed.js for dynamic text effects, and PureCounter.js for animated counters. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile devices, with good SEO practices and accessibility at a basic level. Hosting is via Webflow's CDN, ensuring fast content delivery. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries. However, it lacks some recommended security headers and does not provide visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. Privacy and cookie policies are present but do not include explicit consent mechanisms, indicating room for improvement in privacy compliance. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and aligned with the company's business focus. The absence of WHOIS data limits full domain legitimacy verification, but the privacy protection is justified given the security nature of the business. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, adding incident response information, and improving privacy compliance to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching innerworks.me

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Innerworks operates in the technology sector with a focus on fraud prevention and regulatory compliance solutions for digital platforms. Their business model is B2B SaaS, targeting exchanges, launchpads, and payment protection services. The company leverages advanced technologies such as device fingerprinting and AI-driven ethical hacking to maintain a competitive edge. Their partnership with RedTeam enhances their capability to counter sophisticated fraud techniques. The website content and branding suggest a small but focused company with a clear market niche. The lack of detailed company registration or physical address information limits deeper business intelligence but aligns with privacy-conscious tech firms. The company maintains an active blog and social media presence, indicating engagement with the community and thought leadership.

Security posture

The security posture of Innerworks' website is solid with mandatory HTTPS and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of modern JavaScript libraries appears secure with no known vulnerabilities detected in the included versions. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against certain web attacks. There is no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could hinder transparency and trust in security matters. Privacy policies exist but lack explicit GDPR compliance indicators such as consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve web security.
  2. Publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance transparency and trust with customers.
  3. Enhance privacy compliance by adding explicit cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR-related disclosures.
  4. Consider adding direct contact information such as company emails or phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Innerworks
Description
Innerworks provides advanced user intelligence solutions including device fingerprinting, VPN detection, and geocompliance to stop fraud, meet regulations, and protect transactions without extra steps or slowing users.
Key services
Device fingerprinting, VPN detection, Geocompliance, Ethical hacking platform (RedTeam)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Fonts, Typed.js, PureCounter.js, jQuery 3.5.1, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Webflow
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection or query failure.
  3. Website uses modern web technologies and is hosted on Webflow CDN.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form only.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present but lack explicit consent mechanisms.
  6. No terms of service or security/incident response policies found.
  7. Strong focus on fraud prevention technology and regulatory compliance.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS and hosted on its CDN, ensuring reliable performance and scalability. It uses modern front-end libraries such as Typed.js for dynamic text effects and PureCounter.js for animated counters, enhancing user engagement. Google Fonts are used for typography, and Google Tag Manager is implemented for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags. No CMS vulnerabilities or outdated technologies were detected. The technical implementation is modern and well-maintained, supporting the business goals effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with innerworks.me. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review innerworks.me.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.