Skip to main content

Security report for ingestai.io

IngestAI Labs, Inc. · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IngestAI Labs, Inc. is a Silicon Valley-based startup specializing in AI and data technology consulting and product development. The company leverages its affiliation with Stanford and backing from notable accelerators and grants to position itself as a competitive player in the AI consulting and development market. Their services range from AI product design to full-stack AI development, targeting businesses seeking to integrate AI as a competitive advantage. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks, is mobile-optimized, and hosted behind Cloudflare, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers and DNSSEC are missing. Privacy compliance is basic but present with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-aligned with the company's business claims.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ingestai.io

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector with a focus on AI consulting and development. Its market positioning is strengthened by affiliations with Stanford and recognized industry accelerators. The business model is B2B, offering tailored AI solutions and consulting services. The target customers are enterprises and organizations looking to adopt AI technologies. The company demonstrates growth potential through its ecosystem partnerships and grant support. Revenue streams likely include consulting fees and AI product development contracts. The website content and branding consistently reflect a professional and innovative image, supporting credibility and trust.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, no explicit security policy or incident response information is published, which could be improved. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers suggests room for enhancement in domain and web security. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Tracking scripts from Google and Reddit are used, which require transparent privacy disclosures. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with good foundational practices but lacking advanced security disclosures and protections.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden web security.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
IngestAI Labs, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IngestAI Labs, Inc.
Description
IngestAI Labs, Inc. is a Silicon Valley-based innovation startup focused on helping businesses leverage Data and Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a competitive advantage. They provide AI consulting, AI product design, AI business case design, data and AI strategy development, AI architecture, custom AI model development, and full-stack AI product development services.
Key services
AI Product Design, AI Business Case Design, Data and AI Strategy Development, AI Architecture, Custom AI Model Development, Full-stack AI Product Development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Reddit Pixel, Swiper.js, Toastr.js, Flasher.js, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Cloudflare
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism with samesite=lax
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-conscious cookie settings

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Reddit Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Reddit Pixel
Marketing tools
Toastr.js
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear branding and consistent messaging.
  2. Strong affiliation with reputable organizations and accelerators enhances trust.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented, indicating privacy awareness.
  4. No direct company emails or phone numbers found on the site; contact is via form and social media.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  6. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools is evident.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  8. No visible security headers detected in HTML content; server headers not provided for full analysis.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Swiper.js, and various tracking scripts. It is hosted behind Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata. Performance is moderate, with video content and multiple external scripts that may impact load times. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Accessibility features are basic but present. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from performance optimizations and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ingestai.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ingestai.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.