Skip to main content

Security report for infront.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.infront.com represents a digital marketing agency specializing in SEO, website development, web design, and digital marketing services. The site is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder and Astra theme, indicating a modern and flexible technical infrastructure. The presence of multiple marketing and tracking scripts such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag demonstrates a mature digital marketing setup. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. The website lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. Security posture is moderate with no detected security headers and no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. Overall, the site is professional and content-rich but requires improvements in transparency, security, and compliance to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infront.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a service provider agency in the technology sector, targeting businesses seeking digital marketing and web development solutions. The business model focuses on delivering SEO, web design, and digital marketing services. The website content is well-structured and professionally presented, targeting a general business audience. The lack of explicit company registration or contact details limits the ability to fully assess business credibility. The marketing ecosystem includes partnerships with major platforms like Facebook, LinkedIn, and Google, indicating integration with leading digital advertising channels. Growth indicators and market positioning are not explicitly stated, and no parent or subsidiary companies are identified.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate but with notable gaps. The website uses HTTPS (implied by external script URLs), but no security headers were detected in the provided data. There is no visible privacy policy, cookie consent mechanism, or terms of service, which are critical for GDPR and other compliance frameworks. No incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, limiting the organization's readiness to handle security incidents. The extensive use of third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, establishing incident response contacts, and conducting regular security audits.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish contact information including security incident response and data protection officer details.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS registration information to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website appears to represent a digital marketing agency offering SEO, website development, web design, and digital marketing services.
Key services
SEO, Website Development, Web Design, Digital Marketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, MarketingCloudFX, Yoast SEO, Elementor, WordPress, Astra Theme, Swiper.js
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Crazy Egg
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (via GTM), Crazy Egg
Marketing tools
MarketingCloudFX
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain not found in WHOIS database.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected in the provided content.
  5. Website uses multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  7. Website built on WordPress with Elementor and Astra theme.
  8. Content is focused on digital marketing and web development services.
  9. No visible security or incident response contact information.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor and Astra theme, which supports responsive design and good SEO practices. The tech stack includes popular marketing and analytics tools, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Performance is moderate with preloading fonts and scripts, but no explicit hosting provider or CDN information was found. Accessibility is basic with some focus styles and screen reader text present. SEO optimization is good with Yoast SEO plugin usage and meta tags. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential privacy compliance gaps. Opportunities exist to improve performance, security, and compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infront.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infront.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.