Skip to main content

Security report for infotech.com

Info-Tech Research Group · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Info-Tech Research Group operates as an information technology research and advisory company, targeting IT professionals and organizations seeking expert guidance and research services. The company positions itself as a medium-sized, professional B2B service provider within the technology sector, offering IT research, advisory, and consulting services. The website reflects a mature digital presence with integrated marketing and analytics tools, indicating a focus on data-driven customer engagement and conversion optimization. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript frameworks and third-party services such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Visual Website Optimizer to enhance user experience and gather insights. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, despite the professional appearance and functionality of the site. Security posture is moderate, with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and detailed policies visible in the content. Privacy compliance is minimal based on the available data, with no clear privacy or cookie policies detected. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security disclosures.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of infotech.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infotech.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention infotech.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,093
Employees
8
Customers
992
Third parties
93
Weak passwords
17%

Latest record dated 2026-06-14 · 9 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for infotech.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –sts.infotech.com2026-06-14
  • –infotech.com2026-04-14
  • –sts.infotech.com2026-03-20
  • –www.infotech.com2026-03-20
  • –mail.infotech.com2026-01-10

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the competitive IT research and advisory market, leveraging digital marketing and analytics to maintain a strong online presence. Its business model focuses on providing research insights and advisory services to IT professionals, likely generating revenue through subscriptions, consulting engagements, and research reports. The use of advanced marketing tools suggests a strategic approach to lead generation and customer retention. The lack of visible contact information and privacy policies may impact trust and compliance perceptions. The domain registration inconsistency is a notable risk factor that could affect business credibility. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data, indicating a focused operational scope.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security practices such as HTTPS usage and CSRF token implementation. However, the absence of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. The extensive use of third-party scripts introduces potential vulnerabilities if not regularly audited. No explicit incident response or security policy information is available, limiting transparency. The missing WHOIS data further complicates trust assessment. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in header implementation, policy disclosures, and third-party risk management.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add and configure essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and marketing tools to mitigate supply chain risks.
  4. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available.
  5. Develop and disclose incident response and security policies to improve transparency and preparedness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Info-Tech Research Group
Description
Info-Tech Research Group is an information technology research and IT advisory company providing research, advisory, and consulting services to IT professionals.
Key services
IT research, IT advisory, Consulting services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Hotjar, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Pardot, Aptrinsic, jQuery (implied by VWO usage), JavaScript ES6+
Frameworks
VWO A/B Testing and Analytics Framework
Platforms
Web (desktop and mobile)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by script sources)
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML
  • Use of CSRF tokens in meta tags

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Visual Website Optimizer, Pardot, Bizible
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Reddit Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Visual Website Optimizer, Pardot, Salesloft, Aptrinsic
Marketing tools
Pardot, Bizible, Visual Website Optimizer, Salesloft, Aptrinsic
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and fully functional with rich content.
  2. Extensive use of third-party marketing and analytics tools.
  3. No explicit contact information or privacy/cookie policies found in the provided HTML snapshot.
  4. WHOIS data is missing or domain appears unregistered, which is unusual for a professional business website.
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL usage implied but not confirmed.
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  7. Website uses modern tracking and A/B testing frameworks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with JavaScript frameworks and multiple analytics and marketing integrations. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data, although no JSON-LD structured data was detected in the provided content. Hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the data. The site employs advanced A/B testing and user behavior tracking tools, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in accessibility and security configurations are recommended to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100 −11Medium26 findingsView report
  2. 73/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infotech.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infotech.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.