Skip to main content

Security report for infinitybluemetrics.cz

Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Infinitybluemetrics.cz hosts a Matomo analytics platform login page, indicating it is used for web analytics data access and management. The site is primarily targeted at administrators or users of the Matomo platform. The technical infrastructure is based on Matomo's open-source analytics software, utilizing JavaScript and PHP technologies, hosted under the domain infinitybluemetrics.cz with name servers ns.vas-hosting.com and ns.vas-hosting.eu. The domain WHOIS data is inconsistent, showing a future creation date in 2025, which raises legitimacy concerns. No public business or contact information is available on the site, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating limited compliance with privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infinitybluemetrics.cz

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
53
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website appears to serve as a portal for Matomo analytics users rather than a public-facing business site. There is no evidence of a broader business model, revenue streams, or market positioning beyond providing access to analytics data. The lack of contact details and corporate information limits the ability to assess partnerships or growth indicators. The domain's suspicious WHOIS data further complicates trust assessments. The site likely serves a small user base focused on analytics management.

Security posture

The site uses HTTPS and standard Matomo security features such as password fields with autocomplete disabled and support for two-factor authentication. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, and the login form's submit button is disabled by default, which may affect usability. The absence of visible privacy and security policies, combined with inconsistent domain registration data, suggests gaps in compliance and trust. There is no evidence of incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Correct or clarify domain WHOIS registration data to enhance legitimacy and trust.
  3. Add visible contact information and business details to improve transparency.
  4. Enhance security posture by adding standard HTTP security headers and enabling HSTS.
  5. Provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response information to build security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
free/libre analytics platform
Key services
web analytics, visitor tracking, data reporting
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Matomo analytics platform, JavaScript, PHP
Frameworks
Matomo
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Password fields with autocomplete off
  • Two-factor authentication support indicated in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo tracking
Marketing tools
Matomo analytics
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login page for Matomo analytics platform
  2. No public content or marketing pages detected
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No contact information or business details publicly available
  5. Domain WHOIS data is inconsistent and suspicious
  6. No WAF or blocking detected
  7. Site uses HTTPS and standard Matomo scripts
  8. No external advertising or affiliate links detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on the Matomo analytics platform, leveraging its JavaScript tracking and PHP backend. The site is hosted on servers associated with the registrar REG-GRANSY and name servers ns.vas-hosting.com and ns.vas-hosting.eu. Performance appears moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO optimization is minimal due to lack of meta tags beyond the login page. The site lacks CMS indicators and uses Matomo's native platform. Technical debt is not evident but modernization opportunities include improving security headers and user experience on the login form.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infinitybluemetrics.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infinitybluemetrics.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.