Skip to main content

Security report for ine.cz

ineShop · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, DNS health and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ineShop is a Czech-based company specializing in the creation and development of custom internet shops and e-commerce platforms. The company positions itself as a provider of scalable e-commerce solutions with integration capabilities for ERP and warehouse systems, responsive design, and cloud hosting. The website demonstrates a professional presence with multiple client references and active social media channels, indicating a stable market position within the Czech technology and e-commerce sectors. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries, Google Analytics, and Tag Manager for tracking, and uses a proprietary CMS platform. Performance and SEO optimizations are evident, with excellent Google Lighthouse scores reported on reference projects. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms implemented, though explicit security headers and formal security policies are absent. The lack of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, but the website content and client references support legitimacy. Overall, the site is well-structured, user-friendly, and compliant with GDPR requirements for privacy and cookies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ine.cz

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
95
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ine.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
295
Employees
0
Customers
295
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
27%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ine.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets businesses seeking tailored e-commerce solutions, offering modular services including ERP integration, responsive design, and hosting. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on development and maintenance of online shops. The presence of numerous client references across various industries suggests a diversified customer base and a solid reputation. The company leverages cloud hosting and proprietary technology to maintain control over performance and scalability. Marketing efforts include newsletter subscriptions and social media engagement. The absence of detailed financial or founding data limits deeper business intelligence, but the overall digital maturity and client portfolio indicate a small but established player in the Czech e-commerce technology market.

Security posture

Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be addressed to enhance protection against common web attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, which limits transparency for security researchers. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The security score is moderate, reflecting good baseline practices but room for improvement in formal security governance and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain trust and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ineShop
Description
Tvoříme úspěšné internetové obchody
Key services
Internet shop creation, ERP and warehouse system integration, Responsive design, Server hosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Splide slider, Fancybox
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust score.
  3. Site uses HTTPS with good performance and SEO practices.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented in Czech language.
  5. Multiple client references and social media links enhance credibility.
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response info found.
  7. No contact emails explicitly listed; phone contact is provided.
  8. No terms of service page detected.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a proprietary CMS platform with JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Splide slider, and Fancybox for UI components. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is hosted on dedicated and virtual servers managed by the company, indicating control over infrastructure. Performance is optimized with lazy loading and good Google Lighthouse scores. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with clear navigation. However, no modern web frameworks (e.g., React, Angular) or CMS platforms (e.g., WordPress, Magento) were detected. The absence of security headers and WHOIS data are technical risks that should be addressed to enhance security and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ine.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ine.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.