Skip to main content

Security report for incq-all.com

MAMFORCE · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

INC.Q, operated by MAMFORCE, is a recently established company (founded in 2023) specializing in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) certifications, consulting, and training services. The company positions itself as a leader in DEI initiatives across Europe, offering a range of services including DEI certification, equal pay certification, ESG data reporting, and employer branding. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting businesses seeking to improve their DEI practices and employee engagement. The digital infrastructure is built on WordPress with modern marketing and analytics integrations, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and some best practices, though improvements such as enabling DNSSEC and publishing security policies are recommended. Privacy compliance is well addressed with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, though the domain is very new, aligning with the company's recent founding.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching incq-all.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

INC.Q operates in the DEI consulting and certification sector, targeting medium-sized enterprises and organizations committed to inclusive workplace culture. Their business model revolves around providing certifications, consulting, training, and awards that enhance employer branding and compliance with emerging regulations. The company leverages partnerships with its parent company MAMFORCE and related brand DADFORCE to expand its market reach. The presence of client logos and testimonials from reputable companies strengthens its market credibility. The company appears to be focused on growth within the European market, emphasizing data-driven DEI strategies and ESG reporting as competitive advantages.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. The domain status clientTransferProhibited adds a layer of domain security. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing attacks. No explicit security headers beyond HTTPS were detected, and no published security or incident response policies were found. Forms use reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam and abuse. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is solid for a business website but could be enhanced by implementing additional security headers, DNSSEC, and publishing a security policy and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  3. Add security HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Consider adding direct contact information such as a company email and phone number for better trust and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize tracking footprint.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MAMFORCE
Description
Attract and retain top talent from diverse backgrounds. Boost employee engagement and productivity. Enhance brand reputation. Become a DEI leader with INC.Q
Key services
DEI Certification, Equal Pay Certification, DEI Consulting, ESG Data & Reporting, Employer Branding, DEI Employee Surveys, DEI Training, BEST Inclusive Employer Awards
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Mailerlite, Contact Form 7, Owl Carousel, SVG Support, MonsterInsights
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Use of reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, MonsterInsights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Mailerlite, Lfeeder
Marketing tools
Mailerlite, MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional WordPress site focused on DEI certifications and consulting
  2. Content is rich with client logos, testimonials, and detailed service descriptions
  3. No direct email or phone contact found; contact is via form only
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  5. No terms of service or explicit security policies found
  6. Use of multiple marketing and analytics tools with moderate tracking
  7. No WAF or blocking detected, site fully accessible
  8. Domain is new but consistent with business age and branding
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing common plugins such as Contact Form 7, MonsterInsights for analytics, Mailerlite for marketing automation, and Owl Carousel for UI elements. The site uses jQuery and modern JavaScript libraries for interactivity. SEO is supported by All in One SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) describing the organization and breadcrumbs. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics and marketing scripts. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, but accessibility features are basic and could be improved.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with incq-all.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review incq-all.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.