Skip to main content

Security report for iloader.org

iloader · Technology

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Email security.

Security score

87/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

iloader is an independent IPA app library service catering to iPhone and iPad users who utilize sideloading tools to install apps outside the official App Store. The website provides a curated catalog of IPA files, detailed compatibility information, and installation guidance, supporting users in discovering and safely downloading iOS apps. The business model is based on a one-time payment granting access to approved IPA files for a defined period, with no automatic renewals. The service emphasizes transparency, user education, and compliance with licensing and distribution rights.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
60/ 100 · Medium
GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      iloader.org publishes no SPF record, so receiving servers cannot tell which servers may send mail as this domain.

      What to do: Publish one TXT record listing your mail providers, for example "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourprovider.com -all". A domain that sends no mail should publish "v=spf1 -all".

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      There is no DMARC record at _dmarc.iloader.org, so receivers have no instruction for mail that fails SPF and DKIM.

      What to do: Publish a TXT record at _dmarc.iloader.org, starting with "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@iloader.org" and moving to p=quarantine or p=reject once reports look clean.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iloader.org

This scan found 11 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Payments by EveryPay; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
89
Security headers
68
Email security
65
DNS health
95
Network security
100
Website hygiene
95
GDPR outside view
100
Average
87

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

iloader occupies a niche market segment focused on iOS sideloading enthusiasts and developers seeking alternative app distribution methods. Its competitive advantage lies in providing verified IPA files with detailed metadata, compatibility notes, and integration with popular third-party installation tools like SideStore and LiveContainer. Revenue streams are primarily from library access subscriptions. The company leverages partnerships with payment and email service providers to streamline operations. Growth potential depends on the increasing interest in sideloading and independent app distribution, balanced by the need to maintain trust and legal compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, appropriate security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. It avoids embedding third-party trackers or advertising scripts, enhancing user privacy. However, it lacks a published security policy and incident response plan, which are important for transparency and user trust. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism is a minor compliance gap. Overall, the site is secure but could improve by formalizing security governance and communication.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with EU and global privacy regulations.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website footer.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance contact options with a dedicated security or abuse email address.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party dependencies and monitor for emerging security threats.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
iloader
Description
iloader is an independent IPA app library for iPhone and iPad users who use sideloading tools. The site offers app discovery, release information, compatibility notes, installation guidance, and approved IPA file delivery during a paid access period.
Key services
IPA app discovery, Version and compatibility comparison, Individual IPA file delivery, Installation guidance, Access management via purchase accounts
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Supabase, Dodo Payments, Resend
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with minimal data collection
  • No third-party trackers or ads detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
excellent

Advertising

Transparency
excellent

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is well-structured, professional, and focused on IPA app library services
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via web form
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite privacy policy presence
  5. No advertising or tracking scripts detected, indicating privacy-conscious design
  6. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  7. Clear separation of library access and installation tools
  8. No evidence of malware or phishing
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response information published
Technical notes

Notes

iloader is built on a modern React and Next.js framework, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile responsiveness. The site uses Supabase for backend services, Dodo Payments for payment processing, and Resend for email delivery, indicating a well-integrated cloud-based infrastructure. The absence of a traditional CMS suggests a custom or headless architecture optimized for performance and scalability. SEO and accessibility best practices are well implemented, contributing to good user experience and discoverability. Technical risks are minimal but include dependency on third-party services and the need for ongoing maintenance of security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iloader.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

Loading reviews…

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.