Security report for github.com
GitHub, Inc. · Technology · United States
Low risk. No critical or high findings.
96/100
Risk levelLow
GitHub, Inc. operates the world's leading developer platform, providing source code hosting, collaboration, and AI-powered development tools. As a Microsoft subsidiary, GitHub holds a dominant market position with a comprehensive suite of services including GitHub Actions for CI/CD and GitHub Copilot for AI-assisted coding. The platform targets developers, enterprises, and open source communities globally. Technically, GitHub employs a modern tech stack centered on React and robust cloud infrastructure, ensuring fast, accessible, and scalable service delivery. Security is a core focus, evidenced by multiple certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2) and strong security policies, including incident response and vulnerability disclosure programs. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, GitHub demonstrates a mature, secure, and professional digital presence with high trust and reliability.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- NIS2 outside checks
- 95/ 100 · Low
- GDPR posture
- 100/ 100 · Low
- Checks completed
- 8of 8
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
- (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
- (b) Incident handling: One indicator
- (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
- (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
- (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
- (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
- (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
- (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
- (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
- (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
No critical, high or medium findings.
Nothing urgent to fix right now. Monitoring tells you if that changes.
Keep watching github.com
This scan found 10 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Risk score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Payments by EveryPay; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Maintain continuous dependency and vulnerability scanning to prevent supply chain risks.
- Enhance transparency reports to build further trust with users and enterprises.
- Expand user education programs on security best practices and safe coding.
- Regularly update and audit third-party integrations to mitigate risks.
- Invest in long-term security strategy focusing on emerging threats and compliance.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- GitHub, Inc.
- Description
- GitHub is the world's most widely adopted, AI-powered developer platform where millions of developers, businesses, and the largest open source community build software that advances humanity.
- Key services
- Source code hosting, Version control with Git, CI/CD automation (GitHub Actions), AI code assistance (GitHub Copilot), Security and vulnerability management, Enterprise solutions
- Content quality
- excellent
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- React, JavaScript, Ruby on Rails, GraphQL, AWS S3, CDN (GitHub Assets), HTTP/2, TLS 1.2+
- Frameworks
- React
- Platforms
- Web, GitHub Enterprise, GitHub Actions, GitHub Copilot
- Performance
- fast
- Mobile
- excellent
- Accessibility
- good
- SEO
- good
Security
- Observed score
- 95/100
- Good practices seen
- HTTPS enforced
- Security.txt present
- Incident response contacts published
- Use of modern TLS versions
- Security certifications
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- GitHub Octolytics
- Tracking level
- moderate
- Privacy compliance
- good
Advertising
- Tracking pixels
- GitHub Octolytics
- Marketing tools
- GitHub Octolytics
- Transparency
- good
Site quality
- Design
- excellent
- User experience
- excellent
- Content relevance
- excellent
- Navigation
- excellent
- Professionalism
- excellent
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
- Content is rich, professional, and well-structured.
- Strong security posture with multiple certifications and best practices.
- Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
- Clear business and contact information available.
- Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
- No suspicious or malicious elements detected.
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR and IETF Datatracker (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Earlier scans of this domain
- 65/100Medium25 findingsView report
- 65/100 +3Medium25 findingsView report
- 62/100 −1Medium27 findingsView report
- 63/100 −5Medium27 findingsView report
- 68/100Medium21 findingsView report
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with github.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
Loading reviews…