Skip to main content

Security report for firstpersonboxing.net

First Person Boxing · Technology

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

87/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

First Person Boxing is a niche online gaming website offering a free 3D boxing game playable directly in web browsers without downloads or accounts. The site targets teens and adults interested in quick, skill-based boxing gameplay with AI opponents. The business model relies on ad-supported free access, with no in-game purchases or account requirements, positioning it as a user-friendly and accessible gaming option. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies, including JavaScript frameworks and multiple analytics tools, ensuring good performance, mobile optimization, and SEO. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no exposed vulnerabilities, though it lacks a dedicated security policy or incident response information. Privacy and cookie policies are present and indicate GDPR compliance. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained, with clear content and user guidance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
GDPR outside view
90/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Without HSTS, a visitor who types the address or follows an http:// link makes a first request over plain HTTP, which an attacker on the same network can intercept and keep unencrypted (SSL stripping).

      What to do: Send "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains" on HTTPS responses once every subdomain works over HTTPS (use max-age=31536000 alone otherwise).

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • Medium

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      No Content-Security-Policy is set, so if an attacker manages to inject a script (cross-site scripting), the browser runs it with full access to the page.

      What to do: Start with "Content-Security-Policy: object-src 'none'; base-uri 'self'; frame-ancestors 'self'" and add a script-src that lists your script origins or uses nonces. Test with a Report-Only header first.

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
    • Medium

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Other websites can load your pages inside an invisible frame and trick visitors into clicking buttons on them (clickjacking).

      What to do: Send "Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'self'" (or X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN for older browsers).

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Trackers contacted without a consent banner

      Observed on the first page load as a new visitor, before any consent choice; Guard does not click the banner. The page contacted Google Analytics (region1.google-analytics.com); Google Marketing (ep1.adtrafficquality.google); Google Syndication (pagead2.googlesyndication.com). No tracking cookies were seen, but no consent banner or consent platform was detected either.

      What to do: Confirm these services do not store or read anything on the visitor's device; otherwise load them only after consent.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Medium

      Weak Protocols Supported

      The server still accepts TLS 1.1 and TLS 1.0, deprecated by RFC 8996. Modern browsers no longer use them, but they let outdated clients connect with weak cryptography.

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0 and 1.1; keep TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 (in CDN dashboards this is the "minimum TLS version" setting).

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Keep watching firstpersonboxing.net

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Payments by EveryPay; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
89
Security headers
53
Email security
89
DNS health
94
Network security
100
Website hygiene
95
GDPR outside view
90
Average
87

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the technology sector, specifically in online gaming, offering a unique first-person boxing experience distinct from similar Roblox games. Its competitive advantage lies in browser-based accessibility and no requirement for downloads or accounts. Revenue is likely generated through Google Adsense advertising. The target market includes casual gamers and boxing enthusiasts seeking quick, skillful gameplay. The site demonstrates consistent branding and comprehensive user support via FAQs and policies. There is no indication of parent or subsidiary companies, suggesting a small independent operation. The use of multiple analytics platforms indicates a focus on user behavior insights and marketing effectiveness.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate to high, with HTTPS enforced and no visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The site uses reputable third-party analytics and advertising services, which are standard in the industry. However, the absence of a published security policy, vulnerability disclosure, or incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness for security incidents. No security certifications or frameworks are referenced. The site follows best practices in not collecting sensitive user data via forms and limiting data collection to analytics scripts. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be improved with formal policies and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and user data handling.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Add incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Review and enhance HTTP security headers to cover all best practices (CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, etc.).
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
First Person Boxing
Description
First Person Boxing is a free 3D boxing game playable in web browsers on computers, tablets, and phones. It offers single-player gameplay against AI opponents with no downloads or accounts required.
Key services
3D boxing game playable online, Career ladder mode with AI opponents, Quick Fight mode, Training mode
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React (implied by modulepreload and JS naming), Google Adsense, Google Analytics, Ahrefs Analytics, Plausible Analytics
Frameworks
Likely React or similar SPA framework
Platforms
Web browser
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No forms collecting sensitive data
  • No exposed credentials
  • No inline scripts with eval or unsafe code

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Ahrefs Analytics, Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Tracking pixels
Ahrefs Analytics, Plausible Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-designed, free browser-based 3D boxing game.
  2. No account or payment required, enhancing user trust.
  3. Clear and comprehensive FAQ and gameplay instructions.
  4. Uses multiple analytics and advertising services responsibly.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and accessible.
  7. No direct phone contact or physical address found.
  8. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based tech stack, likely React or a similar framework, with module preloading for performance optimization. It integrates Google Adsense for monetization and multiple analytics platforms (Google Analytics, Ahrefs, Plausible) for user insights. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA attributes. Performance is fast with preloaded images and efficient asset loading. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or static site build. Hosting provider details are not explicit but HTTPS and security headers suggest a professional hosting environment. Technical risks are minimal but include reliance on third-party scripts which should be monitored for vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with firstpersonboxing.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

Loading reviews…

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.