Skip to main content

Security report for if-tech.de

IF-TECH AG · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IF-TECH AG is a Munich-based IT service provider specializing in cloud solutions, modern workplace, and IT security. The company positions itself as an innovation leader and strategic partner, offering scalable and flexible IT concepts tailored to customer needs. Their services include consulting, managed services, and proprietary AI solutions, targeting businesses primarily in Germany. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with modern technologies such as WordPress, Elementor, and integrated analytics tools. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some improvements in security headers and explicit privacy documentation are recommended. WHOIS data lacks detailed registrant information, which slightly impacts transparency but does not detract from the professional business presentation. Overall, IF-TECH AG presents a credible and trustworthy IT services business with a strong market position and good technical implementation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching if-tech.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
43
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention if-tech.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for if-tech.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on IT consulting, cloud services, and security. It is part of the connexta IT group, indicating a broader corporate structure. Their business model revolves around providing tailored IT solutions and managed services to enterprises, emphasizing innovation and future-proofing. The presence of certifications like the ecovadis silver medal highlights commitment to sustainability and quality. The company maintains active engagement through events, webinars, and social media, supporting growth and market visibility. Their partnership ecosystem includes recognized technology vendors and industry events, reinforcing their market credibility.

Security posture

IF-TECH AG maintains a good security posture with enforced HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR principles. However, the absence of explicit privacy and security policies on the website, as well as missing security headers, suggests room for improvement in transparency and defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve trust and compliance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but would benefit from formalized policies and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data processing and GDPR compliance.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user and client agreements.
  3. Implement and display a security policy including incident response contacts.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IF-TECH AG
Description
Die IF-Tech AG bietet zukunftssichere IT-Lösungen mit Spezialisierung auf Cloud, Modern Workplace und Security. Sie entwickeln individuelle IT-Konzepte, die Planungssicherheit und Flexibilität garantieren und mit den Anforderungen der Kunden wachsen.
Key services
Modern Workplace, Cloud Services, Network & IT-Security, Linux Solutions, Datacenter & Infrastructure, IT-Consulting, Managed Services, Executive Briefing Center, IF-Tech Local AI
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Gravity Forms, Borlabs Cookie, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Swiper.js, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, eTracker, HubSpot (disabled)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics (disabled), eTracker
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Borlabs Cookie
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Professional IT service provider focused on cloud, security, and modern workplace solutions.
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress with Elementor).
  4. Cookie consent mechanism implemented via Borlabs Cookie.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  6. Contact available via contact form; no explicit emails or phone numbers found in HTML content.
  7. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube, and Kununu.
  8. Security headers not detected in provided data; SSL is enabled.
  9. WHOIS data lacks detailed registrant info, reducing transparency but not necessarily indicating illegitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder, with additional plugins like Gravity Forms and Borlabs Cookie for forms and cookie management. It uses modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for sliders and integrates Google Tag Manager and eTracker for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices with Yoast SEO plugin usage. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in image loading and script management. The technical stack is current and supports scalability, though hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with if-tech.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review if-tech.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.