Skip to main content

Security report for i-entrepreneuruk.com

i:Entrepreneur · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

i:Entrepreneur is a campaign and content platform focused on highlighting and celebrating businesses led by entrepreneurs from diverse backgrounds. The website serves as a storytelling and awareness-raising medium, offering blog content, events, entrepreneur stories, and a newsletter subscription to engage its audience. The target audience includes entrepreneurs and the wider business community interested in diversity and entrepreneurial success stories. The business model centers on content and community engagement rather than direct commerce. Technically, the website uses a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and FontAwesome, with tracking integrations such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile responsive and uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, no CMS or hosting provider details are evident, and performance is moderate. From a security perspective, the site has a good SSL configuration and secure form inputs but lacks important security headers and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. Tracking technologies are used moderately, but without clear user consent mechanisms, privacy compliance is weak. Overall, the website is professionally designed and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security policies to improve compliance and trustworthiness. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy notices, and incident response readiness are recommended to strengthen the security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching i-entrepreneuruk.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
90
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform positions itself as a niche campaign focused on diversity in entrepreneurship, leveraging storytelling and events to build community engagement. Its competitive advantage lies in its unique focus on diverse entrepreneurs and raising their profile in the economy. Revenue streams are not explicit but likely include sponsorships, event participation, and possibly advertising. The target customers are entrepreneurs from diverse backgrounds and stakeholders interested in inclusive business narratives. The partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms and an advertising network (BrandAdvance). The business appears small and focused on content and community rather than large-scale commercial operations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and secure form validation. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense-in-depth. Lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as no vulnerability disclosure or incident response information, indicates gaps in compliance and readiness. The use of third-party tracking pixels without explicit consent mechanisms further impacts privacy compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and inform users about tracking.
  5. Enhance trust signals by providing more detailed business information and certifications if applicable.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
i:Entrepreneur
Description
The campaign to tell the inspiring stories of businesses led by entrepreneurs of diverse backgrounds, to raise their profile, and ensure their successes are celebrated across the economy not as a minority, but for the incredible value they bring in their own right.
Key services
Storytelling, Events, Blog content, Newsletter subscription
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure form inputs with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
BrandAdvance
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy or cookie policy found
  2. No terms of service found
  3. Contact email present in footer
  4. Newsletter subscription form collects first name, last name, and email
  5. Uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  6. Includes Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics for tracking
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  8. No phone numbers or physical addresses found
  9. Social media links to Facebook and Instagram present
  10. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely adopted frontend technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and FontAwesome for icons. Tracking and analytics are implemented via Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, indicating a moderate level of digital marketing sophistication. The site is served over HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident, and no advanced frameworks or platforms are detected. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or technical debt. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal but present through meta tags and structured navigation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with i-entrepreneuruk.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review i-entrepreneuruk.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.