Skip to main content

Security report for humansecurity.com

HUMAN Security · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

HUMAN Security is an enterprise-focused cybersecurity company specializing in protecting digital interactions from sophisticated bot attacks, fraud, and account abuse. The company positions itself as a leader in bot mitigation and fraud prevention, evidenced by recognition such as the G2 Summer 2025 Grid Report. Their services target enterprises and internet platforms, particularly those involved in digital advertising and online transactions. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, and a strong marketing technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Heap Analytics, and Marketo. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present, though explicit security policies and incident response details are not publicly disclosed. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable gap but does not detract significantly from the overall professionalism and trustworthiness of the site. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security and incident response policies, providing vulnerability disclosure information, and enhancing transparency around data protection officer contacts and certifications.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of humansecurity.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching humansecurity.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

HUMAN Security operates in the technology sector, providing essential cybersecurity solutions to enterprises and digital platforms. Their business model is B2B, focusing on safeguarding revenue streams and user authenticity in digital advertising and online transactions. The company leverages partnerships and integrations with major marketing and analytics platforms to enhance service delivery and customer insights. Market positioning is strong, with leadership recognition and a consistent brand presence across social media channels. The website content is professionally crafted to appeal to enterprise clients, emphasizing trust and security. Growth indicators include active marketing campaigns and publication of industry reports. The company maintains a comprehensive privacy framework, aligning with GDPR compliance, which supports their credibility in regulated markets.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a suite of security headers implemented, including Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. Cookie consent mechanisms are in place, reflecting compliance with privacy regulations. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy or incident response plan limits transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing security audits to mitigate supply chain risks. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file is a gap in responsible disclosure practices. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be enhanced by publishing detailed security governance documents and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide contact information for a Data Protection Officer or security team to facilitate communication.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to minimize security risks.
  5. Enhance visibility of certifications and compliance frameworks to strengthen business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
HUMAN Security
Description
Cybersecurity company that safeguards enterprises and internet platforms from sophisticated bot attacks, fraud, and account abuse.
Key services
Bot mitigation, Fraud detection and prevention, Ad click defense, Account abuse protection
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Heap Analytics, Marketo, Demandbase, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing UET, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Hockeystack
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Heap Analytics, Marketo, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing UET
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
StackAdapt, Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Heap Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Marketo Munchkin, Demandbase, Bing UET, G2 Crowd Tracking
Marketing tools
Marketo, Heap Analytics, Demandbase, Campaign Collector
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professional, well-structured, and targeted at enterprise cybersecurity clients.
  3. Strong use of modern marketing and analytics technologies.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms implemented.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible HTML; contact likely via forms or social media.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  7. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for an established enterprise site.
  8. No suspicious or malicious domains linked.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS and utilizes a modern technology stack including JavaScript libraries, Google Tag Manager, Heap Analytics, Marketo, and Demandbase. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts to optimize page load times. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are well implemented, ensuring a good user experience across devices. SEO is enhanced by comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph data, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require vigilant security management. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence suitable for an enterprise cybersecurity company.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100 −4Medium29 findingsView report
  2. 72/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with humansecurity.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review humansecurity.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.