Skip to main content

Security report for hu-manity.co

Hu-manity.co · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hu-manity.co is a technology company specializing in AI-powered software that enhances data privacy, trust, and transparency between institutions and individuals. Founded in 2018 and headquartered in Sparta, New Jersey, the company offers solutions that transform data privacy contracting, digitize data consumption policies, and integrate identity systems. It has acquired BetterPath and Cookie Notice to expand its offerings. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear messaging, and strong trust signals including testimonials and press coverage. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS, ensuring good performance and security. However, explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available, and security headers are not detected in the HTML content. Overall, the company demonstrates a strong commitment to privacy and compliance, with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms in place.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of hu-manity.co. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hu-manity.co

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Hu-manity.co operates in the technology sector focusing on privacy and data rights, targeting organizations that require trustworthy data governance solutions. Its business model is B2B SaaS and services, leveraging AI to analyze legal contracts and compliance requirements. The company positions itself as a leader in promoting the 31st Human Right related to data property rights. Its competitive advantage lies in combining AI with legal and compliance expertise, supported by a reputable leadership team and advisors. The presence of multiple press logos and social media channels indicates active marketing and brand awareness efforts. The acquisition of complementary companies suggests strategic growth and product diversification.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare DNS, indicating a baseline of secure infrastructure. Domain registration is privacy protected but consistent with business claims. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of visible security headers and public security policies suggests room for improvement in security transparency and hardening. No incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure programs are publicly listed, which could be a gap in security readiness. The contact form uses a popular WordPress plugin (Contact Form 7) which should be regularly updated to avoid vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced security headers and explicit incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security training to strengthen security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hu-manity.co
Description
Hu-manity.co’s software, powered by artificial intelligence, creates, reads, understands, and compares the legal language in data-related contracts that govern data practices between multiple entities. Institutions use Hu-manity.co’s software to restore trust and transparency in digital technologies. Founded in 2018 and headquartered in Sparta, New Jersey. Acquired BetterPath and Cookie Notice.
Key services
Privacy Experience™ software, Data privacy contracting transformation, Data consumption policy digitization, Identity system integration, Cookie consent management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, Revolution Slider, jQuery, Contact Form 7, Mega Addons for Visual Composer, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WPBakery, Revolution Slider
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer, renew, delete, update prohibited domain status
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with consistent branding
  2. Strong emphasis on privacy, trust, and data rights
  3. Leadership and advisors have LinkedIn profiles linked
  4. Multiple reputable press logos displayed
  5. Contact form uses Contact Form 7 plugin
  6. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed on main pages
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies found publicly
  9. No visible security headers detected in HTML content
  10. No analytics or tracking scripts explicitly detected in provided HTML
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using WPBakery Page Builder and Revolution Slider, with additional plugins like Contact Form 7 and Mega Addons. It uses Cloudflare for DNS management and GoDaddy as the registrar. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate with lazy loading for images. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security header implementation. The technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively but should be continuously monitored for plugin vulnerabilities and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100 −1Medium31 findingsView report
  2. 71/100 +3Medium30 findingsView report
  3. 68/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hu-manity.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hu-manity.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.