Skip to main content

Security report for hu-manity.co

Hu-manity.co · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hu-manity.co is a technology company specializing in AI-powered software that enhances data privacy, trust, and transparency between institutions and individuals. Founded in 2018 and headquartered in the United States, it has established a strong market position with over 1 million web properties deploying its Privacy Experience™ software globally. The company focuses on transforming data privacy contracting, digitizing data consumption policies, and integrating identity systems to ensure authenticity and compliance with regulations such as GDPR and CCPA. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, offering a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and secure forms, though some security headers could be improved. The site demonstrates good privacy compliance with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, Hu-manity.co presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence with strong business credibility and technical maturity.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of hu-manity.co. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hu-manity.co

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
60
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Hu-manity.co operates in the technology sector with a B2B business model targeting organizations needing advanced data privacy and compliance solutions. The company leverages AI and natural language understanding to provide unique value in the privacy software market. Its acquisitions of BetterPath and Cookie Notice expand its capabilities and market reach. The presence of reputable press coverage and testimonials indicates strong industry recognition. The company’s mission to promote the 31st Human Right regarding data property rights positions it as a thought leader in privacy advocacy. The absence of phone contact but presence of multiple social media channels suggests a digitally focused customer engagement strategy.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, uses secure contact forms, and does not expose sensitive data in the HTML. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, indicating room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The site does not use a WAF or show blocking mechanisms, allowing full content access. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened with additional headers and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider adding phone contact information or physical address to enhance contact options.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hu-manity.co
Description
Hu-manity.co’s software, powered by artificial intelligence, creates, reads, understands, and compares the legal language in data-related contracts that govern data practices between multiple entities. Institutions use Hu-manity.co’s software to restore trust and transparency in digital technologies. Founded in 2018 and headquartered in Sparta, New Jersey, the company acquired BetterPath and Cookie Notice.
Key services
Privacy Experience software, Data privacy contracting transformation, Data consumption policy digitization, Identity system integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, Revolution Slider, jQuery, Owl Carousel, Mega Menu, Contact Form 7, A3 Lazy Load
Frameworks
WPBakery, Revolution Slider
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure contact forms with validation
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear messaging.
  2. Strong emphasis on privacy, trust, and data rights as core business values.
  3. Multiple reputable press logos and testimonials enhance credibility.
  4. Contact form uses Contact Form 7 with standard fields: name, email, subject, message.
  5. Social media presence includes Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Twitter, and YouTube.
  6. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed on the website.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  8. No visible advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  9. Website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
  10. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a WordPress CMS with popular plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder, Revolution Slider, Contact Form 7, and A3 Lazy Load, indicating a modern and flexible technical infrastructure. The site loads external resources from trusted domains like Google Fonts and Vimeo. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags present. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. No major technical debt or deprecated libraries detected. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and functional website experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100 +2Medium31 findingsView report
  2. 68/100 −3Medium32 findingsView report
  3. 71/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hu-manity.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hu-manity.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.