Skip to main content

Security report for horizonstudio.lv

SIA ThreeCube Group · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Horizon Studio Latvia, operated by SIA ThreeCube Group, is a small Latvian company specializing in digital marketing, IT, and creative services for businesses. Their offerings include social media content creation and management, website development and maintenance, advertising placement, printed marketing materials, and other technology-related services. The company targets small to medium enterprises and organizations primarily in Northern Europe. The website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and technologies, providing a good user experience and accessibility features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and no obvious vulnerabilities, though security headers and formal policies are lacking. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching horizonstudio.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a reliable and innovative partner in digital marketing and technology solutions, focusing on brand recognition and business growth. Their business model revolves around service provision to SMEs and organizations, leveraging digital channels and traditional marketing materials. The website content and structure reflect a clear understanding of their market and audience, with a consistent brand presentation. However, absence of detailed contact information and legal policies may limit trust for some visitors. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses reputable WordPress plugins, including accessibility tools. No security headers were detected in the HTML content, which is a potential area for improvement. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. The lack of a security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates a basic security maturity level. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no GDPR-related disclosures or cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business site but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Publish contact information for security incidents and designate a Data Protection Officer if applicable.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA ThreeCube Group
Description
Uzņēmums nodrošina konsultatīvus un profesionālus radošos un IT pakalpojumus uzņēmumiem, tostarp sociālo mediju satura izstrādi un pārvaldi, tīmekļa vietņu izveidi un uzturēšanu, reklāmas izvietošanu digitālajos kanālos, drukāto tirgvedības materiālu izstrādi un citus tehnoloģiskos pakalpojumus.
Key services
Sociālo mediju satura izstrāde un pārvalde, Tīmekļa vietņu izveide un uzturēšana, Reklāmas izvietošana digitālajos kanālos, Drukāto tirgvedības materiālu izstrāde, Citi tehnoloģiskie pakalpojumi
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, jQuery 3.7.1, LiteSpeed Cache plugin, Gutenberg blocks, FontAwesome 5.13.0, Google Fonts (Inter), Pojo Accessibility plugin, Gallery Block Lightbox plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based business site offering digital marketing and IT services.
  2. Content is in Latvian with some English sections.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  7. Site uses HTTPS and modern web technologies.
  8. Accessibility features are implemented via Pojo Accessibility plugin.
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond standard fonts and icons.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 using Gutenberg blocks and several plugins including LiteSpeed Cache, Pojo Accessibility, and Gallery Block Lightbox. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and FontAwesome 5.13.0 for UI elements. Google Fonts (Inter) are loaded for typography. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO meta tags and structured content. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by image sizes and plugin overhead. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for a small digital marketing and IT service provider, with opportunities to improve security headers and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with horizonstudio.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review horizonstudio.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.