Skip to main content

Security report for helios.eu

Asseco Solutions, a. s. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Asseco Solutions, a. s., operates the Helios.eu website, offering enterprise resource planning (ERP) software solutions tailored to companies of various sizes and public sector organizations. The company positions itself as a mature and established player in the Czech and regional ERP market, providing a range of products including Helios Easy, Inuvio, Nephrite, and Pantheon. The website content is professionally presented, targeting business customers seeking digitalization and integrated business management systems. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies, including a proprietary CMS (Solidpixels), and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight, Hotjar, and Smartlook. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms, alongside a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, no explicit security policy or incident response information is published, and WHOIS data is privacy protected as per EURid policy, which is typical for .eu domains. Overall, the website demonstrates a strong digital presence with good content quality and security posture, suitable for its business audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching helios.eu

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets a broad spectrum of business customers from small startups to large enterprises and public sector entities, offering modular ERP solutions that scale with company size and complexity. The presence of multiple case studies and testimonials indicates a focus on customer success and trust-building. The partnership with Asseco Solutions, a known IT group, strengthens its market credibility. The business model revolves around software licensing, cloud solutions, and value-added services such as business intelligence and attendance systems. The website's multilingual support and regional partner sites suggest a strategy for Central European market penetration. Marketing and analytics tools indicate active lead generation and customer engagement efforts.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and employs Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from automated abuse. Cookie consent is implemented with options for functional, analytical, and marketing cookies, reflecting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of visible security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and lack of published security or incident response policies represent areas for improvement. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, which could enhance transparency and trust. The extensive use of third-party tracking scripts necessitates ongoing security reviews to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be strengthened by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize security risks from external dependencies.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Asseco Solutions, a. s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Asseco Solutions, a. s.
Description
Helios enterprise information systems meet the needs of companies of all sizes across a wide range of business sectors and public administration.
Key services
ERP software solutions, Cloud solutions, Business Intelligence, Attendance systems, Records management software
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar, Smartlook, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Solidpixels CMS, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Solidpixels CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA v3 for forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar, Smartlook, LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel, Leady
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar, Smartlook, Leady
Marketing tools
Leady, Hotjar, Smartlook
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to EURid privacy policy.
  3. Strong presence of tracking and marketing scripts indicating active user analytics and advertising.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms implemented.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  8. Website uses modern CMS and technologies with good mobile optimization.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Solidpixels CMS platform and uses a modern tech stack including Google Fonts, Swiper.js for sliders, and multiple analytics and marketing integrations. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and lazy loading for images, contributing to good performance. Meta tags and Open Graph data are well implemented for SEO and social sharing. The use of asynchronous loading for scripts improves page load times. However, no explicit hosting provider information was found. The site could benefit from enhanced accessibility features and performance optimizations such as security headers and caching strategies. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with helios.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review helios.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.