Skip to main content

Security report for hausmann-johnson.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The domain hausmann-johnson.com is currently parked and does not host any active business content. The landing page is a standard GoDaddy parking page offering the domain for sale, with minimal branding and no company-specific information. The page includes a cookie consent mechanism powered by TrustArc and a Trustpilot widget, but lacks any substantive business or contact details. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript bundles and external services for consent and advertising but does not demonstrate a full-fledged website infrastructure. Security posture is minimal with no HTTPS information available and no security headers detected. Overall, the site presents a low trust profile and is not suitable for business operations in its current state.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hausmann-johnson.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

As the domain is parked, there is no active business model or market positioning to analyze. The domain is managed by GoDaddy, indicating it is available for purchase or future development. No business contact information, certifications, or operational details are present. The presence of Trustpilot and TrustArc widgets suggests an intent to provide trust signals, but these are generic and not tied to any active business entity. The target audience is domain investors or buyers rather than end customers.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS and security headers. No incident response or security policies are published. The cookie consent banner indicates some compliance with privacy regulations, but no further security or data protection measures are evident. The site does not collect user data beyond cookie consent and does not expose any sensitive information. Overall, the security maturity is low, and the domain should not be considered secure for business use without significant improvements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  3. Develop a proper website with clear business information and contact details.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy, security, and incident response policies.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and remove unnecessary advertising or tracking services.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The domain hausmann-johnson.com is currently parked and not hosting active business content. The page is a GoDaddy parking page offering the domain for sale.
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
TrustArc cookie consent, Trustpilot widget, Google Adsense
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Tracking pixels
TrustArc, Trustpilot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Domain is parked and not hosting active business content.
  2. Page is a GoDaddy parking page with domain sale offer.
  3. Cookie consent banner present with TrustArc.
  4. No contact information or business details available.
  5. No security policies or incident response information found.
  6. No forms or data collection beyond cookie consent.
  7. No HTTPS information available from provided data.
  8. External links mostly to consent and advertising providers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is a parked domain landing page hosted by GoDaddy, using React-based static content and external scripts for cookie consent and advertising. The technical implementation is basic with moderate performance and limited mobile optimization. There is no CMS detected, and the site relies on GoDaddy's hosting infrastructure. SEO and accessibility features are minimal, and the site lacks meta tags or structured data describing a business. The technical debt is low due to minimal content but modernization opportunities exist if the domain is developed into an active website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hausmann-johnson.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hausmann-johnson.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.