Skip to main content

Security report for hartleysbedrooms.co.uk

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The domain hartleysbedrooms.co.uk is registered recently in March 2024 with GoDaddy.com, LLC as the registrar. The website currently serves a 404 error page indicating that the deployment cannot be found, hosted on the Vercel platform. There is no accessible content, metadata, or business information available on the site. Consequently, no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, nor are there any contact details or forms. The lack of content and presence of an error page severely limit the ability to assess the business or technical maturity of the site. From a technical perspective, the site is hosted on a modern platform (Vercel) but lacks any detectable technologies, scripts, or SEO optimizations. The mobile optimization and accessibility are minimal due to the error page nature. Security posture cannot be fully assessed due to missing headers and SSL information, but the absence of HTTPS or security headers is a concern. Security-wise, the site shows no signs of active security measures or policies. The domain age and lack of content reduce trustworthiness and increase risk. There are no indications of privacy compliance or incident response readiness. Overall, the site is currently non-functional and does not provide any business or security assurances. Strategically, the domain should be properly deployed with valid content, security configurations, and compliance policies to improve trust and usability. Until then, the site poses a high risk for users and visitors due to lack of information and security controls.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hartleysbedrooms.co.uk

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of any business content or metadata, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain name suggests a bedroom furniture or bedroom-related business, but no services, market positioning, or customer segments are identifiable. The domain's recent registration date indicates a startup or new venture, but without an active website, no competitive advantages or revenue streams can be assessed. No partnerships or ecosystem relationships are evident.

Security posture

The current security posture is very weak. The site lacks HTTPS confirmation, security headers, and any visible security policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The domain's newness and lack of content increase the risk of phishing or malicious use if not properly managed. No data protection officer or GDPR compliance indicators are found. Overall, the site is not ready for secure business operations.

Recommendations

  1. Deploy a functional website with valid content and metadata to replace the 404 error page.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure communications.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  5. Provide clear contact information including emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website currently returns a 404 error page indicating deployment not found
  2. No visible business or contact information on the website
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No forms, scripts, or analytics detected
  5. Hosted on Vercel platform
  6. No security headers or SSL information available from provided data
  7. Domain is very new (registered March 2024) with no content
  8. No external links except to Vercel documentation for error
  9. No social media or contact emails found
  10. No advertising or tracking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Vercel, a modern cloud platform, but currently only serves a 404 error page indicating a missing deployment. No CMS, frameworks, or libraries are detected. The HTML is minimal and lacks meta tags, SEO optimizations, or analytics scripts. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic due to the error page nature. Performance is likely moderate given the minimal content but cannot be fully assessed. The technical debt is high as the site is non-functional and requires full deployment and configuration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hartleysbedrooms.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hartleysbedrooms.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.