Skip to main content

Security report for hamptoncoaches.co.uk

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in DNS health, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.hamptoncoaches.co.uk is currently inaccessible and displays a generic 'Site not found' error page indicating that the site is unpublished or the domain is not assigned. There is no visible business information, contact details, or content describing the company's services or operations. The domain WHOIS lookup failed with an error stating the domain name contains too many parts, which suggests the domain may be invalid or improperly registered under Nominet UK rules. This severely limits the ability to assess the company's legitimacy or market presence. From a technical perspective, the website lacks any detectable technologies, scripts, or frameworks. There is no HTTPS detected, no security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies, indicating a very low level of digital maturity and security posture. The absence of any analytics or advertising technologies further supports the conclusion that the site is inactive or not operational. Security-wise, the lack of HTTPS and security headers, combined with the WHOIS registration issues, represent critical vulnerabilities and trust concerns. There is no evidence of compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations. Overall, the risk profile is high due to the lack of transparency, security controls, and operational presence. Strategically, it is recommended to verify the domain registration status with the registrar, ensure proper domain configuration, and publish a functional website with clear business and security information. Implementing HTTPS and security best practices is essential to establish trust and compliance. Without these improvements, the domain and website cannot be considered credible or secure.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: mx.hamptoncoaches.co.uk.cust.a.hostedemail.com

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 7 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates
  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hamptoncoaches.co.uk

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
59
Security headers
45
Email security
55
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of accessible website content and WHOIS data, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain appears inactive or improperly registered, with no visible market positioning, competitive advantages, or business model insights. There are no indications of partnerships, revenue streams, or customer segments. The lack of any digital footprint suggests the business is either non-operational or the domain is unused.

Security posture

The security posture of the domain is critically weak. The website does not serve content over HTTPS, lacks security headers, and has no visible security or privacy policies. The WHOIS data error indicates potential domain registration issues, which may pose risks of domain hijacking or misuse. There is no evidence of incident response readiness or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Compliance with GDPR and other regulations is not demonstrated. Overall, the security maturity is very low, exposing the entity to significant risks.

Recommendations

  1. Verify and correct domain registration with Nominet UK to resolve naming rule violations.
  2. Publish a functional website with clear business and contact information.
  3. Implement HTTPS with valid SSL/TLS certificates to secure communications.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Publish privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to comply with GDPR and build user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. The website displays a 'Site not found' error page indicating the site is unpublished or domain not assigned. No WAF challenge detected but content is inaccessible. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is inaccessible and shows a 'Site not found' error page.
  2. No business or contact information is available on the site.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No technical or security metadata present in the HTML.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable and indicates domain registration issues.
  6. No external links, forms, scripts, or social media links detected.
  7. No analytics or advertising technologies detected.
  8. Website content quality and professionalism are very poor.
  9. Security posture is minimal with no HTTPS or security headers detected.
  10. Overall, the domain and website appear inactive or improperly configured.
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently serves only a minimal error page with no metadata, scripts, or detectable technologies. There is no CMS or framework identified. The lack of HTTPS and security headers indicates outdated or incomplete technical configuration. Performance and accessibility cannot be properly assessed due to the absence of content. The domain's WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating a possible misconfiguration or invalid registration. Overall, the technical infrastructure is insufficient for a professional online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hamptoncoaches.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hamptoncoaches.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.