Skip to main content

Security report for hai.tg

新加坡海王科技公司 · Technology · Singapore

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

海王出海是一家专注于海外社交流量推广的技术和营销资源平台，隶属于新加坡海王科技公司，成立于2021年。该网站提供丰富的跨境电商、社交媒体营销工具和资源导航，涵盖Facebook、WhatsApp、LINE、Instagram、Twitter等多个主流平台，面向跨境行业运营人员和广告优化师。技术上，网站采用了jQuery、Bootstrap、Font Awesome和Swiper等现代前端技术，具备良好的移动端适配和用户体验。安全方面，网站启用了HTTPS，但缺乏关键安全头部和隐私合规政策，存在改进空间。整体风险适中，建议加强隐私政策建设和安全防护措施以提升合规性和用户信任。

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hai.tg

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

该网站定位于跨境电商和海外社交流量推广领域，提供多样化的营销工具和资源链接，形成了较为完善的合作伙伴生态。通过丰富的内容和工具推荐，吸引目标客户群体——跨境运营人员和广告优化师。业务模式以资源导航和推广服务为主，结合广告合作实现收入。市场竞争中，网站以中文内容和针对性强的工具集为优势，具备一定的行业影响力。未来可通过完善合规政策和增强安全措施提升市场竞争力。

Security posture

网站当前安全成熟度中等，启用HTTPS保障数据传输安全，但缺少内容安全策略（CSP）、严格传输安全（HSTS）等安全头部。表单使用GET方法，存在潜在数据泄露风险。未发现明显敏感信息泄露或恶意代码。缺乏隐私政策和Cookie政策，可能导致合规风险。建议加强安全头部配置，改进表单安全，完善隐私合规文档，并定期进行安全审计。

Recommendations

  1. 优先实施和配置安全HTTP头部，如Content-Security-Policy和Strict-Transport-Security
  2. 将表单提交方式改为POST，避免敏感数据通过URL暴露
  3. 制定并公开隐私政策和Cookie政策，提升GDPR等法规合规性
  4. 定期更新和扫描第三方库，防止已知漏洞利用
  5. 增强网站无障碍访问性，提升用户体验和合规性
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
新加坡海王科技公司
Description
海王出海专注海外社交流量推广，提供亚马逊、独立站、跨境电商和外贸行业站外引流营销工具资源和网址导航，涵盖Facebook广告投放、Google广告投放及多平台群控协议、引流加粉、海外接码、海外推广等资源，适合跨境行业运营人员和广告优化师系统性学习。
Key services
社交流量推广, 营销工具资源, 网址导航, 广告投放支持, 群控协议及引流工具, 海外接码服务
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage inferred (site uses https URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Forms use GET method with minimal fields

Analytics and tracking

Services
51.la
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
OTca (custom ad scripts)
Tracking pixels
51.la (Chinese analytics/tracking)
Marketing tools
Facebook Ads, Google Ads
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Chinese with focus on social media marketing and cross-border e-commerce tools.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. Contact information is limited to a contact page link; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Technical stack uses common libraries and frameworks but lacks advanced security headers.
  6. Multiple external links to partner and resource sites are present.
  7. No adult or NSFW content detected.
  8. Advertising scripts and tracking are present but limited to known services.
  9. WHOIS data shows domain is registered via a known registrar with no privacy protection.
Technical notes

Notes

网站基于自研CMS，采用主流前端框架Bootstrap和jQuery，结合Swiper实现响应式和交互效果。页面结构清晰，SEO优化较好，支持移动端访问。性能表现中等，部分资源通过缓存机制优化。缺乏现代安全头部和隐私合规组件，存在技术债务。建议引入现代前端构建工具和安全扫描流程，提升整体技术质量和安全水平。
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hai.tg. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hai.tg.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.