Skip to main content

Security report for gvk.com

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at gvk.com currently serves as a minimal redirect page using a frameset to https://www.gvk.com, with no substantive content or metadata present. The lack of HTTPS and security headers indicates a weak security posture, and no privacy or cookie policies are available, which raises compliance concerns. The DNS configuration shows multiple A records and Microsoft Outlook-based email services, but no DNSSEC or CAA records are enabled, reducing DNS security. The site includes a third-party tracking script from rumjs.rumito.net, indicating minimal analytics usage. Overall, the website lacks professional content, contact information, and security best practices, resulting in a low trust and credibility profile.

Scanned

4 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      Email Security Check Incomplete

      Some email security checks timed out

      What to do: Manual verification may be needed for complete assessment

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

Keep watching gvk.com

This scan found 4 issues across 3 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
Average
78
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • SSL/TLS: did not complete in this scan.
  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of business-related content, metadata, or structured data, no clear business model, market positioning, or key services can be identified. The domain appears registered and active with consistent WHOIS data, but no company information or sector classification is available. The site likely serves as a placeholder or redirect rather than a full business website. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data provided.

Security posture

The security posture is weak, with no HTTPS encryption, no security headers, and no DNSSEC or CAA records. The presence of a third-party tracking script without accompanying privacy policies suggests potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site is vulnerable to interception and lacks modern security controls, which could expose users to risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable DNSSEC and configure CAA records to enhance DNS security and certificate issuance control.
  4. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  5. Enhance website content quality, metadata, and accessibility to improve SEO and user experience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a frameset to redirect users to https://www.gvk.com, with no direct content served on the HTTP URL. The server identifies as 'DNSME HTTP Redirection', indicating a DNS Made Easy redirection service. DNS records include multiple IPv4 addresses and Microsoft Outlook MX records. No SSL/TLS is configured on the HTTP endpoint. The site loads a third-party JavaScript tracking script from rumjs.rumito.net. Performance data is unavailable or zero, indicating no measurable load or resource data. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features, and no CMS or frameworks are detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gvk.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gvk.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.