Skip to main content

Security report for gtranslate.io

GTranslate Inc · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GTranslate Inc operates a mature and well-structured website offering automated and neural machine translation services for websites, targeting businesses seeking to expand their global reach through multilingual content. The company provides a SaaS model with free and tiered paid plans, emphasizing ease of use, SEO benefits, and translation quality. The technical infrastructure leverages Cloudflare for DNS and hosting, uses modern JavaScript and SVG graphics, and includes interactive elements such as video backgrounds and live chat support. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate significantly impacts the security posture, exposing users to potential risks and undermining trust. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website demonstrates good business credibility and user experience but requires urgent security improvements to meet industry standards.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of gtranslate.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gtranslate.io

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gtranslate.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,760
Employees
0
Customers
1,760
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
6%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for gtranslate.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GTranslate holds a strong market position as a technology provider specializing in website translation and localization services. Its competitive advantage lies in offering neural machine translation with manual editing capabilities and a Translation Delivery Network that hosts translated content on language-specific domains. The business model is subscription-based with a free trial to attract new customers. The target audience includes website owners, e-commerce businesses, and digital marketers aiming for international expansion. The company maintains partnerships with major CMS platforms and translation API providers, enhancing its ecosystem. Growth indicators include a mature domain, multiple pricing tiers, and active customer base. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing security and privacy compliance to strengthen market trust.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate but compromised by the lack of a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical vulnerability. While the site avoids known SSL/TLS vulnerabilities and does not expose sensitive data visibly, the absence of HTTPS undermines data confidentiality and integrity. Security headers are minimal, and advanced protections like HSTS, OCSP stapling, and session resumption are not implemented. There is no evidence of a formal security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program. Compliance with GDPR is partially indicated through the privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing. The security culture appears basic, with room for significant improvement to protect users and business assets.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  3. Add and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance privacy transparency.
  5. Develop and publish a formal security policy and vulnerability disclosure program to improve trust and incident response readiness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern web technologies including JavaScript and jQuery, uses SVG for graphics, and integrates video backgrounds for enhanced user experience. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. However, the site suffers from slow load times (7.3 seconds) and a large page size (~400KB), which could be optimized. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, canonical links, and multilingual URL structures. The absence of a CMS suggests a custom-built solution, which may require dedicated maintenance. Technical risks include the missing SSL certificate and lack of advanced security configurations, which could impact business operations and user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium32 findingsView report
  2. 66/100Medium32 findingsView report
  3. 66/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gtranslate.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gtranslate.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.