Skip to main content

Security report for gruposicor.com

Grupo SICOR · Other · Spain

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Grupo SICOR is a Spanish security services company with over 20 years of experience, specializing in protection of large infrastructures and events. The company is backed by the reputable El Corte Inglés group, positioning it as a trusted provider in the security sector. The website reflects a professional business model targeting organizations requiring integral security solutions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO, OneTrust for cookie consent, and Weglot for multilingual support, hosted by Acens Technologies. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, although some accessibility features could be improved. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms but lacks advanced security headers and a published security policy or incident response contacts. The domain registration is transparent but relatively new compared to the company's claimed history, suggesting a possible rebranding or domain change. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant with basic privacy standards, but could enhance transparency and security posture further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gruposicor.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gruposicor.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
127
Employees
0
Customers
73
Third parties
54
Weak passwords
6%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for gruposicor.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Grupo SICOR operates in the security services sector, focusing on integral security solutions for large infrastructures and events. Its market position is strengthened by the backing of El Corte Inglés, a major Spanish retail group, which likely provides financial and brand support. The business model is service-oriented, targeting corporate and institutional clients. The website's multilingual capabilities indicate an intent to serve a broader European audience. The absence of direct contact details on the homepage suggests contact information may be located deeper in the site or handled via forms. The company leverages modern digital marketing and compliance tools, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. No affiliate or advertising networks were detected, focusing the site on direct service promotion.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, and uses OneTrust for cookie consent, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security represents missed opportunities to harden security. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, which could hinder responsible vulnerability reporting. No contact emails or phone numbers related to security or incident response were found. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Weglot introduces potential risk vectors that require regular auditing. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a business website but could be improved with enhanced headers, explicit security policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and improve transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Grupo SICOR
Description
Contamos con más 20 años de experiencia en protección de grandes infraestructuras y eventos. Con el respaldo de El Corte Inglés.
Key services
Protection of large infrastructures, Event security, Integral security services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, PHP (implied by WordPress), jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Weglot (multilingual plugin), WP Rocket (performance optimization), Yoast SEO
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No DNSSEC enabled (potential improvement area)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent, Weglot translation plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and business-focused on security services.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via OneTrust.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage HTML.
  5. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  7. Multilingual support via Weglot plugin.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2, using a modern theme and plugins including Yoast SEO for search optimization, OneTrust for cookie compliance, Weglot for multilingual support, and WP Rocket for performance optimization. The hosting provider is Acens Technologies, a reputable Spanish hosting company. The site loads with moderate speed and is mobile optimized with responsive design. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site uses Google Fonts and jQuery 3.7.1. The presence of preconnect and preload hints indicates some performance optimization efforts. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no advanced security headers were detected. The domain age is relatively young compared to the company's claimed history, which may indicate a domain change or rebranding. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gruposicor.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gruposicor.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.