Skip to main content

Security report for greenpak.com.mt

GreenPak Co-op Society Ltd. · Other · Malta

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GreenPak Co-op Society Ltd. is a Malta-based cooperative society established in 2004, specializing in providing legal compliance and waste recovery services for businesses trading in Malta. The company is an ERA authorised waste recovery organisation focusing on packaging, WEEE, batteries, and accumulators recycling. With over 1,200 members, GreenPak holds a strong market position as a pioneer and trusted provider in the Maltese waste recovery sector. The website reflects this business focus with clear service offerings, project highlights such as iBiNs and Batteries for Hospice, and a cooperative ownership model. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10 CMS, leveraging modern frontend libraries including jQuery UI, Bootstrap, and Nivo Slider. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity and professional design quality. Cookie consent is implemented with an opt-in mechanism, supporting GDPR compliance. However, no explicit security or incident response policies are publicly available. No analytics or tracking services were detected, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. Security posture is moderate with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit policies. The domain registration details align well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional, functional, and compliant with basic privacy requirements, serving its target audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
3/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching greenpak.com.mt

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
3
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention greenpak.com.mt, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
19
Employees
0
Customers
19
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for greenpak.com.mt.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GreenPak operates as a cooperative society owned by its business members, providing essential compliance services for waste recovery mandated by Maltese law. Its business model centers on collective responsibility and service provision for packaging, WEEE, and battery recycling. The company’s market position is strong locally, with over 1,200 members and multiple projects such as iBiNs and Batteries for Hospice enhancing its ecosystem. The website supports business growth by offering member login/registration and clear project information. Partnerships with related domains like ibins.greenpak.com.mt and batterybin.mt indicate a collaborative approach. The absence of advertising and minimal tracking suggests a focus on service quality and trust rather than commercial marketing.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the HTML content. Cookie compliance is implemented with an opt-in banner, supporting GDPR. No security headers were detected in the provided data, and no incident response or security policies are published. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were found. The site uses modern libraries but should regularly audit dependencies. The lack of explicit security contact channels or vulnerability disclosure policies indicates room for improvement in incident readiness and transparency. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced with formal policies and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies including contact channels for reporting vulnerabilities or abuse.
  3. Ensure SSL/TLS certificates are properly configured and enforced site-wide.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party libraries and update them to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GreenPak Co-op Society Ltd.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GreenPak Co-op Society Ltd.
Description
Businesses trading in Malta are by law required to recover and recycle the resulting packaging waste, waste electrical goods and batteries, and GreenPak provides legal compliance to all such organisations. Established in 2004, GreenPak is the pioneer of post-consumer waste recovery in Malta. GreenPak is an ERA authorised waste recovery organisation licensed to recover and recycle Packaging, WEEE, Batteries & Accumulators, on behalf of businesses. In 2010 GreenPak became a Cooperative Society Limited owned by the very companies using GreenPak’s compliance services. With over 1,200 members, GreenPak remains the most trusted waste recovery scheme in Malta.
Key services
Packaging waste recovery, WEEE (Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment) recycling, Battery and accumulator recycling, iBiNs recyclable waste service, Batteries for Hospice program
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, jQuery, jQuery UI, Nivo Slider, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Owl Carousel, Venobox, jsPDF
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Uses Drupal 10 CMS with modern frontend libraries.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with opt-in mechanism.
  4. Clear business contact information including email, phone, and physical address is provided.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies found on the site.
  6. No visible analytics or tracking services detected.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is linked.
  8. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  9. Content is focused on waste recovery compliance services in Malta.
  10. The site is mobile optimized and has good navigation clarity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and secure CMS platform, with a frontend stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, and Nivo Slider for interactive and responsive UI elements. The site uses custom and contributed Drupal modules and themes, indicating a tailored solution. Performance is moderate, with multiple CSS and JS assets loaded, but no explicit performance optimization details were found. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive menus and layouts. SEO is basic with meta description and viewport tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA roles and landmarks but could be improved. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with greenpak.com.mt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review greenpak.com.mt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.