Skip to main content

Security report for greeninteriors.co.uk

Bright Green · Other · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bright Green is a UK-based specialist company offering bespoke artificial, preserved, and live plants, trees, green walls, and high-level planting solutions. Their website presents a professional and well-structured digital presence, targeting businesses and individuals seeking interior and exterior plant solutions. The company leverages WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO for content management and optimization, integrating modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Google Ads, and Cookiebot for consent management. The website is accessible without any WAF or security challenges, indicating good operational stability. However, the WHOIS data for the domain 'www.brightgreen.co.uk' is unavailable due to domain naming rules violations, suggesting the actual domain is 'brightgreen.co.uk'. This discrepancy slightly impacts trust but does not undermine the site's legitimacy. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security headers and policies are not fully documented. Privacy compliance is moderate, with cookie consent but lacking a clearly linked privacy policy page. Overall, the site demonstrates a good balance of business professionalism, technical implementation, and security awareness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching greeninteriors.co.uk

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bright Green operates in a niche market specializing in bespoke artificial and preserved plants and green walls, serving both B2B and B2C customers. Their market position is that of a specialist provider with a focus on quality and customization. The business model revolves around direct sales and bespoke project services. The website's content and structure support clear navigation and product categorization, enhancing user engagement. Marketing efforts include Google Ads and analytics tracking, indicating active customer acquisition strategies. The absence of explicit contact details and privacy policy pages suggests areas for improvement in customer trust and regulatory compliance. The company appears to maintain consistent branding and professional content, supporting a high trustworthiness rating.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates cookie consent management via Cookiebot, reflecting adherence to basic security and privacy standards. Google reCAPTCHA cookies imply bot protection on forms, though no explicit forms were detected in the analyzed content. Security headers are not explicitly visible in the HTML, suggesting potential for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The lack of a published security policy or incident response information indicates limited transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from documented policies, explicit security headers, and a vulnerability disclosure mechanism.

Recommendations

  1. Publish and link a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  3. Add a security policy and incident response information accessible to users and partners.
  4. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security transparency.
  5. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is consistent with the website domain to enhance legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bright Green
Description
Transform your space with Bright Green’s bespoke artificial & preserved plants, trees, green walls, and high-level planting.
Key services
Artificial Plants, Preserved Plants, Live Plants, Green Walls, High-level Planting, Bespoke Planting Solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Google Ads, Jet Engine, 3D Flipbook DFlip Lite
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA (implied by cookies)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Ads Conversion Tracking
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional design and consistent branding
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML
  5. No privacy policy or terms of service explicitly linked or found
  6. Use of modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and Yoast SEO
  7. Google Analytics and Google Ads tracking present
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to domain naming error
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and flexible CMS infrastructure. It uses jQuery and integrates third-party services such as Cookiebot for cookie consent and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tags. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets for enhanced UI/UX, including responsive and accessibility features. Performance is moderate with lazy loading of images and optimized media delivery. However, some accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The technical stack is well-suited for the business needs but would benefit from ongoing performance and security audits.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with greeninteriors.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review greeninteriors.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.