Skip to main content

Security report for gravils.com

Gravils · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gravils is a small mobile marketing agency based in Riga, Latvia, founded in 2021. The company focuses on providing mobile marketing campaign services, including risk-free test launches for clients. The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform and hosted by Hostinger, utilizing modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and GSAP for animations. The agency maintains an active social media presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, and Vimeo, supporting its marketing efforts. From a technical perspective, the website demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no privacy policy or terms of service pages found, though a cookie consent banner is present. Overall, Gravils presents a professional and trustworthy online presence for a small agency, but should enhance its privacy and security practices to align with best practices and regulatory requirements. Strategic improvements in security headers, DNSSEC, and formal privacy documentation would strengthen its risk posture and client trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gravils.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gravils operates in the technology sector, specifically in mobile marketing services targeting businesses seeking to launch marketing campaigns. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on campaign management and testing. Market positioning appears niche and specialized, with a focus on risk-free campaign launches. The company leverages social media and digital marketing tools to reach its audience. The domain age and WHOIS data align with the company's recent founding, indicating consistency and legitimacy. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, suggesting an independent small business. The presence of multiple social media channels and tracking tools indicates an active marketing strategy and growth orientation.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, and the domain status clientTransferProhibited adds a layer of domain security. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents gaps that could expose the site to DNS spoofing or clickjacking attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency for security researchers. The cookie consent mechanism is a positive indicator for privacy compliance, but the lack of a privacy policy and terms of service is a compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small agency but requires enhancements to meet higher standards and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and search engine ranking.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gravils
Description
mobile marketing agency
Key services
mobile marketing campaigns, risk free test launch for marketing campaigns
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Facebook Pixel, jQuery 1.10.2, GSAP TweenMax, SmoothScroll, Tilda platform scripts and CSS
Frameworks
Tilda website builder
Platforms
Tilda CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited to prevent unauthorized transfers
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
bant.io
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, bant.io, lfeeder.com
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a mobile marketing agency based in Latvia
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented
  4. Contact information includes email and physical address in Riga, Latvia
  5. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, Vimeo
  6. Uses Tilda CMS and hosting by Hostinger
  7. No DNSSEC enabled
  8. No explicit security headers detected
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  10. No data protection officer contact found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, leveraging a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, jQuery, GSAP animations, and SmoothScroll for enhanced user experience. Hosting is provided by Hostinger, a reputable provider. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design techniques. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve speed. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security configuration. The site lacks structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced SEO and does not provide detailed metadata beyond basic Open Graph tags. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small agency but can be improved for security and SEO robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gravils.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gravils.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.